Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T15:22:52.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The National Research Council, Study of the Isolation System for Geologic Disposal of Radioactive Wastes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Thomas H. Pigford
Thomas H. Pigford*
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
Get access

Abstract

This study was conducted for the U. S. Department of Energy by the Waste Isolation Systems Panel appointed by the National Academies of Science and Engineering. The panel was charged to review the alternative technologies available for Isolating of radioactive waste in mined geologic repositories, evaluate the performance benefits from these technologles as potential elements of a waste Isolation system, and identify appropriate technical criteria for satisfactory long-term performance of a geologic repository. Conceptual repositories in basalt, granite, salt, and tuff were considered. Site-specific data on geology, hydrology, and geochemical properties were evaluated and used to define parameters for estimating long-term environmental releases, supplemented when necessary by generic properties.

The technology for solid waste forms and waste packages was reviewed and evaluated. Borosilicate glass and unreprocessed spent fuel are the waste forms appropriate for further testing and for repository designs. Testing in a simulated repository environment is necessary to develop an adeauate prediction of the long term performance of waste packages in a geologic repository. Back-up research and development on alternative waste forms should be continued. The expected functions of backfill placed between the rock and waste package need clearer definition and validation.

The overall criterion to be used by federal agencies in designing a geologic waste-isolation system and in evaluating its nerformance has not yet been specified. As a guideline, the panel selected an average annual dose of 10-4 sieverts to a maximally exposed individual at any future time, if the exposure is from expected events such as the slow dissolution of waste solids in wet-rock repositories and the groundwater transport of dissolved radionuclides to the biosphere. Risks from unexpected events such as human intrusion were not evaluated.

Calculations were made of the long-term isolation and environmental releases for conceptual repositories in basalt, granite, salt, and tuff. The major contributors to geologic isolation are the slow dissolution of key radioelements as limited by solubility and by diffusion and convection in groundwater surrounding the waste solids, long water travel times from the waste to the environment, and sorption retardation in the media surrounding the repository. Dilution by surface water can reduce the individual radiation exposures that can result from the small fraction of the waste radioactivity that may ultimately reach the environment. Estimates of environmental releases and individual doses were made both for unreprocessed spent fuel and for reprocessing wastes.

Accelerated dissolution of waste exposed to groundwater during the period of repository heating was also considered. Long-term environmental releases of radioactivity from some repositories were calculated to cause doses to maximally exposed individuals that are several orders of magnitude below the Individual dose criterion of 10-4 Sieverts per year. Other conceptual repositories were found to not meet the individual dose criterion, although these repositories could still meet the radioactivity release limits in the standard proposed by the Environmental Protection Agency.

The technology for geologic waste disposal has advanced to the state of a preliminary technical plan, suitable for testing, verification, and for pllot-facility confirmation. The waste Isolation program needs a reliable prediction of long-term performance that will serve as a basis for final design, construction, licensing, and waste emplacement.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 26: Symposium D – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VII , 1983 , 461
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Pigford, T. H., Blomeke, J. O., Brekke, T. L., Cowan, G. A., Falconer, W. E., Grant, N. J., Johnson, J. R., Matusek, J. M., Parizek, R. R., Pigford, R. L., White, D. E., “A Study of the Isolation System for Geologic Disposal of Radioactive Wastes,” National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. (April, 1983).Google Scholar
2. Plgford, T. H., “Long-Term Environmental Impacts of Geological Repositories,” International Conference on Radioactive Waste Management, IAEA-CN-43/185, Seattle, Wash. (May, 1983).Google Scholar
3. Chambre´, P. L., Pigford, T. H., “prediction of Waste Performance in a Geologic Repository,” Proceedings of the Materials Research Society, The Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, Boston, 1983.Google Scholar
4. Krauskopf, K., Stanford University, Private Communication (1982).Google Scholar
5. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Wastes In Geologic Repositories Technical Criteria,” 10 CFR 60, Federal Register 48 (120), 28194–28229 (June, 1983).Google Scholar
6. Harada, M., Chambre´, P. L., Foglia, M., Higashi, K., Iwamoto, F., Leung, D., Pigford, T. H., and Ting, D., “Migration of Radionuclides Through Sorbing Media: Analytical Solutions-I,” LBL-10500 (February, 1980).Google Scholar
7. Pigford, T. H., Chambre´, P. L., Albert, M., Foglia, M., Harada, M., Iwamoto, F., Kanki, T., Leung, D., Masuda, S., Muraoka, S., and Ting, D., “Migration of Radionuclides Through Sorbing Media: Analytical Solutions-II,” LBL-11616 (October, 1980).Google Scholar
8. Chambré, P. L., Pigford, T. H., Zavoshy, S., “Solubility-Limited Dissolution Rate in Groundwater,” Trans. Amer. Nucl. Soc., 40, p. 153 (1982).Google Scholar
9. Chambré, P. L., Pigford, T. H., Zavoshy, S., “Solubility-Limited Fractional Dissolution Rate of Vitrified Waste In Groundwater,” Trans. Amer. Nucl. Soc., 33, p. 185 (1980).Google Scholar
10. Chambre´, P. L., Pigford, T. H., Fujita, A., Kanki, T., Kobayashi, R., Lung, H., Ting, D., Sato, Y., and Zavoshy, S. J., “Analytical Performance Models For Geologic Repositories,” LBL-14R42 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Deju, R. A., Rockwell Hanford Operations, “Hydrologic Parameters for the Basalt Repository Host Rock,” letters to T. H. Pigford (April and June, 1982).Google Scholar
12. Brown, D. J., Rockwell Hanford Operations, “Hydrologic Parameters for the Basalt Repository Host Rock,” letters to T. H. Pigford (June, 1982).Google Scholar
13. Goldsmith, S., Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation, “Evaluation of Information Tables From NAS-WISP,” letter to J. O. Neff (June, 1982).Google Scholar
14. Raines, G. E., Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation, Private Communication (1982).Google Scholar
15. Bechtel Group, Inc., “Preliminary Information Report for a Conceptual Reference Repository In a DeeD Geologic Formation”, ONWI 121, Part 1, February, 1981.Google Scholar
16. U. S. Department of Energy, “Management of Commercially Generated Radioactive Waste, Final Environmental Impact Statement,” DOE/EIS-046F (1980).Google Scholar
17. Cloninger, M. O. and Cole, C. R., “A Reference Analysis on the Use of Engineered Barriers for Isolation of Sent Nuclear Fuel in Granite and Basalt,” PNL-3530 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Tyler, L. D., Sandia National Laboratories, letters to T. H. Pigford (Maw, 1982).Google Scholar
19. Dove, F. H., “AEGIS Methodology Demonstration: Case Example in Basalt,” Proc. Waste Management 1982, Post, R., Ed., 233 (1982).Google Scholar
20. Dove, F. H., Cole, C. R., Foley, M. G., Bond, F. W., Brown, R. E., Deutsch, W. T., Freshley, M. D., Gupta, S. K., Gtknecht, T. J., Kuhn, W. L., Lindberg, J. W., Rice, W. A., Shalla, R., Washburn, J. F., Zellmer, J. T., “Geologic Simulation Model in Columbia Basalt,” PNL 3542 (September, 1982).Google Scholar
21. Napier, B. A., Kennedy, W. E. Jr., and Soldat, J. K., “PABLM – A Computer Program for Calculating Accumulated Radiation Doses From Radlonuclides in the Environment,” PNL-3209 (1980).Google Scholar
22. International Commission on Radiological Protection, Publication 30, “Limits for Intakes of Radionuclides by Workers,” Part 1, 1979, Supplement to Part 1, 1979, Part 2, 1980, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1979, 1980).Google Scholar
23. Runkle, G. E. and Soldat, J. K., “Comparison of ICRP-2 and ICRP-30 for Estimating the Dose and Adverse Health Effects from Potential Radionuclide Releases From a Geologic Waste Repository,” SAND81-2163C, Proc. Waste Management 1982 Symposium, Tucson, Arizona (March, 1982).Google Scholar
24. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Environmental Standards for the Management and Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level and Transuranic Radioactive Wastes,” Federal Register 47 (250): 58196-58206 (December, 1982).Google Scholar
25. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Wastes in Geologic Repositories: Technical Criteria,” Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking by NRC in 10 CFR 60, Washington, D. C. (August, 1982).Google Scholar
26. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “Technical Criteria for Regulating Geologic Disposal of Hih-Level Radioactive Waste: Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking by NRC,” 10 CFR 60, Federal Register 45 (94), 31393–31408 (1981).Google Scholar
27. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “Disposal of High-Level Radioactive Wastes in Geologic Repositories: Rationale for Performance Objectives In 10 CFR 60,” Washington, D. C. (June, 1982).Google Scholar
28. Altenhofen, M. K., “Waste Package Heat-Transfer Analysis: Model Development and Temperature Estimates for Waste Packages in a Repository Located in Basalt,” RHO-BWI-ST-18 (October, 1981).Google Scholar
29. Chambre´, P. L., Williams, W. J., Kim, C. L., Pigford, T. H., “Time-Temperature Dissolution and Radlonuclide Transport,” UGB-NE-4033 (June, 1983).Google Scholar