Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T11:44:51.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nanotechnology, Biology, Ethics and Society: Overcoming the Multidisciplinary Teaching Challenges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Linda Vanasupa ,
Matthew Ritter ,
Barbara Schader ,
Katherine Chen ,
Richard Savage ,
Peter Schwartz  and
Lynne Slivovsky
Linda Vanasupa
Affiliation:
lvanasup@calpoly.edu, California Polytechnic State University, Materials Engineering, Building 41, Room 229, San Luis Obispo, CA, 93407, United States, 805-756-1537, 805-756-2299
Matthew Ritter
Affiliation:
mritter@calpoly.edu, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, 93407, United States
Barbara Schader
Affiliation:
bschader@calpoly.edu, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, 93407, United States
Katherine Chen
Affiliation:
kcchen@calpoly.edu, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, 93407, United States
Richard Savage
Affiliation:
rsavage@calpoly.edu, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, 93407, United States
Peter Schwartz
Affiliation:
pschwart@calpoly.edu, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, 93407, United States
Lynne Slivovsky
Affiliation:
lslivovs@calpoly.edu, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, 93407, United States
Get access

Abstract

One of the inherent challenges of teaching any emerging technology like nanotechnology, is the fact that its core competencies flux in the new disciplines' early stages. Nanotechnology presents an additional challenge in that its underpinnings cross multiple traditional disciplinary boundaries. We have designed a course that aims to address some of these challenges through a handful of structural features: team-based learning; a “reverse of the learning pyramid” approach; team-teaching; embedded information literacy techniques; and application-centered content. Our course is organized around four applications that are in their developmental stages: gold nanoshells for cancer treatment; molecular manufacturing; tissue engineering of a vital organ; and a microfluidic glucose sensor. These applications provide natural contexts for learning biology at the cellular level, the molecular level, the organ level and the biological systems level, respectively. They also provide natural contexts to introduce ideas of scientific uncertainty in emerging fields. In this paper, we will present the design features of our sophomore-level course Nanotechnology, biology, ethics and society and some preliminary results.

Keywords

nanoscalebiologicalbiomedical
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 931: Symposium KK – Education in Nanoscience and Engineering , 2006 , 0931-KK01-09
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Michaelsen, L.K., Knight, A. Bauman, Fink, L. D., eds., Team-Based Learning: A Transformative Use of Small Groups in College Teaching (Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC, 2004).Google Scholar
2 Drexler, K., “Machine-Phase Nanotechnology,” Scientific American (September 2001): 74–75.Google Scholar
3 Schwartz, P.V., Lavrich, D.J., and Scoles, G., “Overlayers of Long Chain Organic Molecules Physisorbed on the Surface of Self-Assembled Monolayers of Alkylthiols on Au(111)” Langmuir 19 (2003): 4969.Google Scholar
4 Schwartz, P.V., “Molecular Transport from an AFM tip: a Comparative Study of Dip-Pen Nanolithography,” Langmuir 18 (2002): 4041.Google Scholar
5 Springer, L., Stanne, M.E., and Donovan, S.S., “Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis,” Review of Educational Research 69 (1999): 1–21.Google Scholar
6 Bolbeck, C.L., Campbell, S.E., and Bjorklund, S.A., “Grouping in the Dark,” J. Higher Education 71 (2000): 1–16.Google Scholar
7 Bloom, B.S., Englehart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., and Krathwohl, D.R., Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. New York: Longman, 1956.Google Scholar
8 Hutchison, M.A., Follman, D.K., Sumpter, M., Bodner, G.M., “Factors Influencing the Self-Efficacy Beliefs of First-Year Engineering Students,” J. Engineering Educ. (% (2006): 39–47.Google Scholar
9 Bandura, Albert, Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory (New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1986).Google Scholar
10 Park, Robert L., “Voodoo Science: The Seven Warning Signs of Bogus Science,” Chronicle of Higher Ed. 49(21) B20 (Jan 31, 2003).Google Scholar
11 Merkle, R., “Self Replicating Systems and Molecular Manufacturing,” www.zyvex.com/nanotech/selfRepJBIS.html (last accessed on May 1, 2006).Google Scholar
12 Stix, G., “Little Big Science”, Scientific American (September 2001): 32–37.Google Scholar
13 Drexler, K., “Machine-Phase Nanotechnology,” Scientific American (September 2001): 74–75.Google Scholar
14 Smalley, R., “Of Chemistry, Love and Nanobots,” Scientific American (September 2001): 76–77.Google Scholar
15 Steingraber, S., “The Pirates of Illiopolis,” Orion vol 24, #3 (May/June 2005): 16–27.Google Scholar
16 Raven, P., “Science, Sustainability, and the Human Prospect,” Science 297 (August 9, 2002): 954–958.Google Scholar
17 Brongersma, M., “Nanoshells: Gifts in a gold wrapper,” Nature Materials 2 (May 2003): 269–297.Google Scholar
18 Loo, C., Lowery, A., Halas, N., West, J., and Drezek, R., “Immunotargeted Nanoshells for Integrated Cancer Imaging and Therapy,” Nano Letters 5, 4 (2005): 709–711.Google Scholar
19 Service, R., “Nanotechnology Takes Aim at Cancer,” Science 310 (November 18, 2005): 1132–1134.Google Scholar
20 Chan, C., Berthiaume, F., Nath, B., Tilles, A., Toner, M., and Yarmush, M., “Hepatic Tissue Engineering for Adjunct and Temporary Liver Support: Critical Technologies,” Liver Transplantation 10, 11 (November 2004): 1331–1342.Google Scholar
21 Ma, P., “Scaffolds for tissue fabrication,” Materials Today (May 2004): 30–40.Google Scholar
22 Kim, J.H, Kim, B.G., Yoon, J.B., Yoon, E., Han, C.H., “A new monolithic microbiosensor for whole blood analysis,” Sensors and Actuators A, 95 (2002): 108–113.Google Scholar