Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T23:26:09.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Morphology of Mesoporous Silica Grown on Organic Surfaces: Effects of Surface Functional Groups and Microstructures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Atsushi Hozumi
Affiliation:
Bioceramics Laboratory, Ceramics Technology Department, National Industrial Research Institute of Nagoya, 1-1 Hirate-cho,Kita-ku, Nagoya 462–8510, Japan, ahozumi@nirin.go.jp
Yoshiyuki Yokogawa
Affiliation:
Bioceramics Laboratory, Ceramics Technology Department, National Industrial Research Institute of Nagoya, 1-1 Hirate-cho,Kita-ku, Nagoya 462–8510, Japan, ahozumi@nirin.go.jp
Tetsuya Kameyama
Affiliation:
Bioceramics Laboratory, Ceramics Technology Department, National Industrial Research Institute of Nagoya, 1-1 Hirate-cho,Kita-ku, Nagoya 462–8510, Japan, ahozumi@nirin.go.jp
Katsumasa Hiraku
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Processing Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University, Furo-cho,Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464–8603, Japan
Hiroyuki Sugimura
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Processing Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University, Furo-cho,Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464–8603, Japan
Osamu Takai
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Processing Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University, Furo-cho,Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464–8603, Japan
Masazumi Okido
Affiliation:
Center for Integrated Research in Science and Engineering, Nagoya University, Furocho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464–8603, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Through organized surfactant templating, mesoporous silica (MPS) was prepared on two different types of substrates with a hydrophilic or hydrophobic surface. In this study, a Si substrate covered with photochemically-grown surface oxide was served as the hydrophilic surface. The hydrophobic surfaces were prepared by forming an organosilane self-assembled monolayer (SAM) on Si substrates through chemical vapor deposition. Octadecyltrimetoxysilane or (heptadecafluoro-1,1,2,2-tetrahydro-decyl) trimethoxysilane was used as a precursor. The morphologies of the deposited MPS on these surfaces were found to be quite different. The MPS formed on the hydrophilic Si substrate consisted of small disk-like features of 2∼5 μm in diameter, while those on the hydrophobic SAM surfaces were continuous thin films. These morphological differences of the deposited MPS were ascribable to the differences in the supramolecular template structure formed on each of the surfaces. Furthermore, in order to study microstructure effects on the MPS growth, a micropatterned SAM/Si, on which hydrophobic regions were spaced alternately with hydrophilic regions at a 5 μm-wide interval, was employed as a sample substrate. On this substrate, MPS was preferentially grown on the hydrophobic regions while the hydrophilic regions remained almost undeposited. The spatial control of surfactant-assembling using the micropatterned SAM surface was successfully accomplished.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] a) Kresge, C. T., Leonowicz, M. E., Roth, W. J., Vartuli, J. C. and Beck, J. S., Nature 359, 710 (1992). b) H. Yang, A. Kuperman, N. Coombs, S. Mamiche-Afara and G. A. Ozin, Nature 379, 703 (1996). c) I. A. Aksay, M. Trau, S. Manne, I. Honma, N. Yao, L. Zhou, P. Fenter, P. M. Eisenberger and S. M. Gruner, Science 273, 892 (1996).Google Scholar
[2] Ballew, H. W., Am. Biotechnol. Lab. May, 8 (1997).Google Scholar
[3] a) Sakai, H., Baba, R., Hashimoto, K., Fujishima, A. and Heller, A., J. Phys. Chem. 99, 11896 (1996). b) C. Y. Tamagawa, P. Schiller and D. L. Polla, Sensors Actuators A35, 77 (1992).Google Scholar
[4] a) Fendler, J. H., Chem. Mater. 8, 1616.(1996). b) J. A. Rogers, Z. Bao, A. Makhija and P. Braun, Adv. Mater. 11, 741 (1999). c) Ö. Dag, G. A. Ozin, H. Yang, C. Reber and G. Bussiere, Adv. Mater. 11, 474 (1999). d) I. Honma and H. S. Zhou, Adv. Mater. 10, 1532 (1998).Google Scholar
[5] a) Sugimura, H. and Nakagiri, N., J. Photopolym. Sci. Technol. 10, 661 (1997). b) A. Hozumi, K. Ushiyama, H. Sugimura and O. Takai, Langmuir 15, 7600 (1999).Google Scholar
[6] Holländer, A., Klemberg-Sapieha, J. E., Wertheimer, M. R., Macromolecule 27, 2893 (1994).Google Scholar
[7] Sugimura, H., Ushiyama, K., Hozumi, A. and Takai, O., Langmuir, in press, (LA990953E).Google Scholar
[8] Moller, K., Bein, T. and Fischer, R. X., Chem. Mater. 11, 665 (1999).Google Scholar
[9] Yang, H., Coombs, N., and Ozin, G. A., Science 386, 692 (1997).Google Scholar
[10] Parks, G. A., Chem. Rev. 65, 177 (1965).Google Scholar
[11] Wängnerud, P. and Olofsson, G., Colloid, J. Interf. Sci. 153, 392 (1992).Google Scholar
[12] Manne, S. and Gaub, H. E., Science 270, 1480 (1995).Google Scholar
[13] Yang, H., Coombs, N., and Ozin, G. A., Adv. Mater. 9, 811 (1997).Google Scholar
[14] Sugimura, H. and Nakagiri, N., Appl. Phys. A 66, S427 (1998).Google Scholar