Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T17:20:14.437Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Polymer-Nanotube Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

S. J. V. Frankland  and
D. W. Brenner
S. J. V. Frankland
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7907, sjvf@eos.ncsu.edu
D. W. Brenner
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7907, sjvf@eos.ncsu.edu
Get access

Abstract

The structure and mechanical properties of nanocomposites composed of (10,10) carbon nanotubes in an amorphous polyethylene matrix have been modeled with molecular dynamics simulations. Two systems were studied, an infinite nanotube (via periodic boundaries) and a finite capped nanotube 6 nm in length. In the infinite case the modulus in the direction of the nanotube is given by the upper bound of the rule of mixtures, as expected under isostrain conditions for a well-aligned fiber-reinforced composite. In the finite case, no load transfer is observed at low strain, consistent with the weak nanotube-polymer adhesion and a subcritical nanotube length. The simulations predict that regions of amorphous polymer close to the bulk density remain around the nanotubes at relatively large strains, and that the density decrease during strain results primarily from chain disentanglement and alignment in regions between nanotubes.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 593: Symposium U – Amorphous & Nanostructured Carbon , 1999 , 199
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Salvetat, J. P., Briggs, G. A. D., Bonard, J. M., Bacsa, R. R., Kulik, A. J., Stockli, T., Burnham, N. A., and Forro, L., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, p. 944 (1999).Google Scholar
2. Cornwell, C. F. and Wille, L.T., Solid State Comm 101, p. 555 (1997).Google Scholar
3. Lourie, O. and Wagner, H. D., J. Mater. Res. 13, p. 2418 (1998).Google Scholar
4. Jin, L., Bower, C., and Zhou, O., Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, p.1197 (1998); C. Bower, R. Rosen, L. Jin, J. Han, and O. Zhou, Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, p. 3317 (1999).Google Scholar
5. Schadler, L. S., Giannaris, S. C., and Ajayan, P. M, Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, p. 3842 (1998).Google Scholar
6. Andrews, R., Dickey, B., Qian, D., Knutson, B., Safadi, B., Moore, B., and Derbyshire, F., in Carbon '99, 24th Biennial Conference on Carbon 11-16 July 1999: Extended Abstracts and Program (American Carbon Society, 1999) p. 624.Google Scholar
7. Shaffer, M. S. P. and Windle, A. H., Adv. Materials 11, p. 937 (1999).Google Scholar
8. Forester, T. R. and Smith, W., The DL_POLY User Manual Version 2.11, CCLRC, Daresbury Laboratory, Daresbury, 1998.Google Scholar
9. Brenner, D. W., Phys. Rev. B 42, 9458 (1990). A slightly modified form is used for the present calculations. (D. W. Brenner, O.A. Shenderova, S. B. Sinnott, and J. A. Harrison, unpublished).Google Scholar
10. Clarke, J. H. R., in Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics in Polymer Sciences, edited by Binder, K. (Oxford University Press, New York, 1995) p. 272.Google Scholar
11. Allen, M. P. and Tildesley, D. J., Computer Simulation of Liquids, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1987.Google Scholar