Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T11:02:15.529Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modelling the in Situ Performance of Bentonite-Sand Buffer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

H.S. Radhakrishna ,
K.-C Lau ,
B.H. Kjartanson  and
S.C.H. Cheung
H.S. Radhakrishna
Affiliation:
Ontario Hydro Research Division, 800 Kipling Ave., Toronto, Ontario M8Z 5S4
K.-C Lau
Affiliation:
Ontario Hydro Research Division, 800 Kipling Ave., Toronto, Ontario M8Z 5S4
B.H. Kjartanson
Affiliation:
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Whiteshell Nuclear Research Establishment, Pinawa, Manitoba ROE ILO
S.C.H. Cheung
Affiliation:
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Whiteshell Nuclear Research Establishment, Pinawa, Manitoba ROE ILO
Get access

Abstract

In the Canadian nuclear fuel waste management concept, a number of engineered barriers, such as the bentonite-sand buffer which surrounds the waste container in the emplacement boreholes, are used to inhibit the transport of radionuclides. The buffer material is also required to effectively conduct heat from the fuel-waste containers to the surrounding rock. To a large extent, in situ buffer performance will depend on the degree of moisture within the buffer. The moisture content will in turn depend on temperature, temperature gradients, and buffer initial and moisture flux boundary conditions. Modelling of coupled heat and moisture transport in the buffer before resaturation is necessary to assess in situ buffer performance. This paper describes the results of a parametric study using the Philip and de Vries coupled heat and moisture transport model to assess the effects of variations in the moisture diffusivity parameters and the boundary conditions on buffer performance.

The results show that the thermal performance of the buffer is affected by heat-induced moisture movement. In particular, the thermal vapour diffusivity, DTvap, has the most significant effect on thermal drying in a closed system. Work is currently underway to improve our capability to model coupled heat and moisture transport in buffer. Laboratory experiments are in progress to more accurately define the moisture diffusivity parameters and the model is being modified to include the effects of boundary moisture fluxes and pressure potentials so that the resaturation process may be modelled. A full scale buffer/container experiment is currently being planned for conduct in AECL's Underground Research Laboratory to assess further the effects of scale and in situ boundary conditions on buffer performance and to qualify the model.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 176: Symposium U – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIII , 1989 , 725
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Dixon, D.A. and Gray, M.N.. Proceedings 19th Information Meeting of the Canadian Nuclear Fuel Waste Disposal Management Program, Toronto, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Technical Record, TR-350, Volume 3, pp. 513–530 (1985).Google Scholar
2. Radhakrishna, H.S., Chan, H.T., Crawford, A.M. and Lau, K.C.. Accepted by the Canadian Geotechnical Journal. To be published in 1989.Google Scholar
3. Philip, J.R. and Vries, D.A.de. Am. Geophys. Union Trans, 38(2), pp. 222–232 (1957).Google Scholar
4. Taylor, S.A. and Cary, J.W.. Soil Sci. 28, pp. 167–172 (1964).Google Scholar
5. Yong, R.N., Mohamed, A.M.O., and Xu, D.M.. Presented at the Workshop on Artificial Clay Barriers for High Level Radioactive Waste Repositories, Lund, Sweden, October 5-7, (1988).Google Scholar
6. Thomas, H.R.. J. of Eng. Mech., ASCE, Vol. 113, pp. 1163–1180 (1987).Google Scholar
7.A.Selvadurai, P.S.. Report to NSERC, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa (1988).Google Scholar
8. Radhakrishna, H.S., Lau, K.-C., and Crawford, A.M.. J. of Geotech. Eng., ASCE, vol. 110, pp. 1766–1784 (1984).Google Scholar
9. Yong, R.N., Mohamed, A.M.O., Caporuscio, F., Xu, D.M. and Wang, B.. First annual report on moisture diffusivity in buffer material due to temperature gradients, Geot. Res. Centre, McGill Univ. (1989)Google Scholar
10. Radhakrishna, H.S. and Lau, K.-C.. Ontario Hydro Civil Research Dept. Report No. 88–13-K (1988).Google Scholar
11. Keil, L.D. and Kjartanson, B.H.. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Report, in preparation (1989).Google Scholar
12. Radhakrishna, H.S.. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Report No. AECL-7805, (1984).Google Scholar
13. Mitchell, J.K., Brandon, T.L., Cameron, J.T., McMillan, J.C. and Chan, C.K.. Report EL-4856, Research Project 7841-1 (1986).Google Scholar
14. Radhakrishna, H.S. and Lau, K.-C.. Ontario Hydro Civil Research Department Report No. 89–47-K (1989).Google Scholar