Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-23T20:20:16.002Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modelling of the Interaction Between an Engineered Clay Barrier and Concrete Structures in a Deep Storage Vault

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

L. Trotignon ,
H. Peycelon ,
M. Cranga  and
F. Adenot
L. Trotignon
Affiliation:
Commissariat à l Energie Atomique, Direction du Cycle du Combustible, DESD, CE Cadarache, France.
H. Peycelon
Affiliation:
UMR 172 CNRS/CEA/Université d'Evry, France - Analyse et Environnement, France
M. Cranga
Affiliation:
Commissariat à l Energie Atomique, Direction du Cycle du Combustible, DESD, CE Cadarache, France.
F. Adenot
Affiliation:
Commissariat à l Energie Atomique, Direction du Cycle du Combustible, DESD, CE Cadarache, France.
Get access

Abstract

The degradation of concrete structures in a storage vault will release an alkaline plume influencing the geochemical evolution of clay engineered barriers or plugs. The studied configuration has a representative scale and is composed of a rectangular clay barrier interfaced on one side with a cement block and on the other side with an external granitic field. A clay model including major and accessory minerals is used; cement material is supposed to be made of portlandite and CSH minerals. The clay barrier and the cement block are assumed to be initially saturated and in equilibrium with their respective interstitial water. Diffusive transport of aqueous species coupled to chemistry is simulated in a one dimension space up to 10000 y. The feed-back of the porosity evolution on the transport properties is not taken into account. The temperature is supposed to be constant (25°C). Calculations are performed with the TRIO-EF coupled transport-chemistry code.

The main results deal with the evolution of the pH profile across the clay barrier, the dissolution of clay minerals and the precipitation of new solid phases in the clay such as albite, gibbsite and CSH. These simulations show that the pH excursion includes only a minor part of the clay barrier at 10 000 y and that the CSH precipitation retards the alkaline plume progression. The appearance of local accumulations of newly precipitated minerals might reduce strongly the porosity. Future developpements of this work include: (i) the completion of the geochemical model by introducing other minerals in concrete (other CSH phases and sulfo-aluminates) and ion exchange sites within the clay, (ii) the implementation of a precipitation/dissolution model in order to describe on a realistic way the porosity profile evolution and possible clogging phenomena.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 556: Symposium QQ – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXII , 1999 , 607
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] K, Bateman, Coombs, P., Noy, D.J., Pearce, J.M. and Wetton, P.D. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXI, McKinley, I.G. and McCombie, C. Eds. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 506, Davos, 1997) pp.605–611 Google Scholar
[2] Chermak, J.A. Clays and Clay Minerals, 41, 365–372 (1993)Google Scholar
[3] Fritz, B., Made, B. and Tardy, Y. SKB report (TR 88-18) (1988)Google Scholar
[4] Lichtner, P.C., Palaban, R.T. and Steefel, C.I. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXI, McKinley, I.G. and McCombie, C. Eds. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 506, Davos, 1997) pp.709–718 Google Scholar
[5] Linklater, C. (ed) A natural analogue study of the Maquarin hyperalkaline system. Phase II. Nirex Sci Rep (in press) Harwell, UK.Google Scholar
[6] Eberl, D.D., Velde, B. and McCormick, T. Clay and Clay Minerals 28, 49–60 (1993)Google Scholar
[7] Lajudie, A., Raynal, J., Petit, J.-C. and Toulhoat, P. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVIII, Murakami, T. and Ewing, R. C. Eds. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 353, Kyoto, 1994) pp. 221–230 Google Scholar
[8] Wieland, E., Wanner, H., Albinsson, Y., Wersin, P. and Karland, O. SKB report (TR 94-26) (1994)Google Scholar
[9] Cranga, M., Trotignon, L., Martial, C. and Castelier, E. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXI, McKinley, I.G. and McCombie, C. Eds. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 506, Davos, 1997) pp. 629–636.Google Scholar
[10] Berner, U.R. Waste Management, 12, 201–219 (1992)Google Scholar
[11] Reardon, E.J. Waste Management, 12, 221–239 (1992)Google Scholar
[12] Neal, F.B. in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XX, Murphy, W.M. and Knecht, D.A. Eds. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 412, Boston, 1996) pp. 483–490.Google Scholar
[13] Stronach, S.A.and Glasser, F.P. Advances in Cement Research, n°36, pp 167–181, (1997)Google Scholar
[14] Abdennour-Pfiffer, M., PhD thesis, Univ. Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, France (1994)Google Scholar