Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T02:53:10.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modeling of Hysteresis Properties of Lead Zirconate Titanate Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

In K. Yoo
Affiliation:
Department of Materials EngineeringCollege of Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksbur, VA 24061
Seshu B. Desu
Affiliation:
Department of Materials EngineeringCollege of Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksbur, VA 24061
Get access

Abstract

It is proposed that the polarization reversal mechanism in ferroelectric ceramics such as titanates is controlled by nucleation, growth, merging and shrinkage of ferroelectric domains. These domain phenomena are in turn determined by the nature of Barkhausen jumps, internal electric field, and dielectric relaxation times of the dipoles. Based on the proposed polarization reversal mechanism, a quantitative model was developed for simulating the hysteresis properties of lead zirconate titanate (PZT) thin films. The simulated hysteresis loops are in good agreement with the experimental results.

It was observed that dielectric viscosity, which is very useful in understanding fatigue and aging behavior of PZT thin films, is one of the key parameters that controls the hysteresis properties.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Yoo, I.K. and Desu, S.B., posted at MRS Fall Meeting, Boston, 1991 (to be published)Google Scholar
2. Zharov, S.N. and Rudyak, V.M., Fizika, No.2, pp. 914, Feb., 1989.Google Scholar
3. Omura, M., Adachi, H., and Ishibashi, Y., Jap. J. of Appl. Phys., Vol. 30, No. 9B, pp. 23842387, Sep., 1991.Google Scholar
4. Miller, S.L., Nasby, R.D.. Schwank, J.R., Rodgers, M.S., and Dressendorfer, P.V., J. Appl. Phys., 68(12), pp. 64636471, Dec., 1990.Google Scholar
5. Furukawa, T. and Date, M., J. Appl. Phys., 54(3), pp. 15401546, March 1983.Google Scholar
6. Pertsev, N.A. and Zembil'gotov, A.G., Sov. Phys. Solid State 33(1), Jan. 1991.Google Scholar
7. Rudyak, V.M., Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR. Seriya Fizicheskaya, 47(4), 1983.Google Scholar
8. Newton, R.R., Ahearn, A.J. and Makay, F., Phys. Rev., Vol. 75, pp. 103, 1948.Google Scholar
9. Kajiama, S. and Kato, K., J. Phys. Soc. Japan, Vol. 50, pp. 373, 1950.Google Scholar
10. Miller, R.C., Phys. Rev. Vol. 111(1), pp. 736, 1958.Google Scholar
11. Rudyak, V.M., Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR. Seriya Fizicheskaya, 45(9), 1981.Google Scholar