Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T14:26:35.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modeling Effects of Material Properties and Three-Dimensional Surface Roughness on Thermal Barrier Coatings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Michael L. Glynn
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University, Mechanical Engineering, Baltimore, MD 21218
K.T. Ramesh
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University, Mechanical Engineering, Baltimore, MD 21218
P.K. Wright
Affiliation:
GE-Aircraft Engines, Materials and Process Engineering Department, Cincinnati, OH 45215
K.J. Hemker
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins University, Mechanical Engineering, Baltimore, MD 21218
Get access

Abstract

Thermal barrier coatings (TBCs) are known to spall as a result of the residual stresses that develop during thermal cycling. TBC's are multi-layered coatings comprised of a metallic bond coat, thermally grown oxide and the ceramic top coat, all on top of a Ni-base superalloy substrate. The development of residual stresses is related to the generation of thermal, elastic and plastic strains in each of the layers. The focus of the current study is the development of a finite element analysis (FEA) that will model the development of residual stresses in these layers. Both interfacial roughness and material parameters (e.g., modulus of elasticity, coefficient of thermal expansion and stress relaxation of the bond coat) play a significant role in the development of residual stresses. The FEA developed in this work incorporates both of these effects and will be used to study the consequence of interface roughness, as measured in SEM micrographs, and material properties, that are being measured in a parallel project, on the development of these stresses. In this paper, the effect of an idealized three-dimensional surface roughness is compared to residual stresses resulting from a grooved surface formed by revolving a sinusoidal wave about an axis of symmetry. It is shown that cylindrical and flat button models give similar results, while the 3-D model results in stresses that are significantly larger than the stresses predicted in 2-D.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Miller, R.A., Oxidation-Based Model for Thermal Barrier Coating Life, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 67, 517521 (1984).Google Scholar
2. Brindley, W.J., Properties of Plasma Sprayed Bond Coats, Thermal Barrier Coatings Workshop Proceedings, NASA Publication No. 3312 (1995).Google Scholar
3. Tolpygo, V.K. and Clarke, D.R., Surface Rumpling of a (Ni,Pt)Al Bond Coat Induced by Cyclic Oxidation, Acta Mater., 48, 32833293 (2000).Google Scholar
4. Brindley, W.J. and Whittenberger, J.D., Stress Relaxation of Low Pressure Plasma-Sprayed NiCrAlY Alloys, Mat. Sci. Eng., A163, 3341 (1993).Google Scholar
5. Pan, Deng, Wright, P.K. and Hemker, K.J., Measuring the Properties of Diffusion Aluminide Bond Coat Layers with Microsample Tensile Testing, MRS Conference Proceedings, this symposium, (2000).Google Scholar
6. Ferguson, B.L., Petrus, G.J. and Ordillas, M., A Software Tool to Design Thermal Barrier Coatings, NASA Phase I Final Report – Project No. 93–1-04.23-477 (1994).Google Scholar
7. Wright, P.K., Influence of Cyclic Strain on Life of a PVD TBC, Mat. Sci. Eng., A254, 191200, (1998).Google Scholar
8. Choi, Sung Ryul, Hutchinson, John W., Evans, A.G., Delamination of Multilayer Thermal Barrier Coatings, Mech. of Mater., 31, 431447 (1999).Google Scholar