Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T00:45:06.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microstructure development of HfOx thin films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2015

Eliane F. Chinaglia
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Centro Universitário da FEI, Av. Humberto de Alencar Castelo Branco, 3972, 09850-901, São Paulo, Brazil
Luis H. Avanci
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Centro Universitário da FEI, Av. Humberto de Alencar Castelo Branco, 3972, 09850-901, São Paulo, Brazil
Get access

Abstract

Morphological and crystallographic characteristics of HfOx with different oxygen concentrations (0 ≤ x ≤ 2.5) and thicknesses (18 nm ≤ t ≤ 310 nm) were analyzed in this work before and after thermal annealing at 700°C in N2 atmosphere for 1h. The morphology of the as-deposited, low oxygen concentration films (t = 100 nm) is formed by a well-defined granular structure with grains around 20 nm in diameter. For higher oxygen concentration, the roughness increases, as a consequence of a very porous surface morphology. At the same time, the crystallographic structure changes from HCP with a {0002} preferred orientation to an amorphous structure as oxygen concentration increases. As the thickness of the HfO2 films increases, we also observed the formation of a high surface porosity, with pore diameter ranging from 80 nm to 120 nm. The changes observed in morphology and crystallinity of the films, as we increase the concentration of contaminants, occurs because of the lowering of the adatoms surface diffusion, which prevents them from reaching lower energy points during the formation of the microstructure of the films. Furthermore, this lowered surface diffusion favors the process of grain renucleation, which leads to roughness increasing, and to an enhancement of the formation of porous surfaces. After annealing, all films exhibit the monoclinic crystallographic phase associated with HfO2. Surface morphology of the films is consistent with a polycrystalline structure with grain diameters varying between 10 nm and 200 nm. As their size increases, the grains become very faceted, a finding consistent with the improvement in film crystallinity. Our results suggest that long-time annealing promotes the diffusion of oxygen from the SiO2-Hf interface to the film, compensating any O2 deficit in the film. Formation of the monoclinic phase is also favored by the improvement in the film stoichiometry promoted by thermal treatment. Also, the critical size of the nuclei, associated with a grain growth in a particular crystallographic orientation, decreases as a consequence of the high temperature during thermal annealing. Therefore, formation of faceted grains and increasing of surface roughness are favored in thicker films.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aygun, G., et al. , Thin Solid Films 519, 5820 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bengi, S., Bülbül, M.M., Current Applied Physics 13, 1819 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bright, T.J, et al. , Thin Solid Films 520, 6793 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, W.J., et al. , Journal of the Korean Physical Society 45, S716 (2004)Google Scholar
Choi, J.H., et al. , Materials Science and Engineering R 72, 97 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackley, J.C, Gougousi, T., Thin Solid Films 517, 6576 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinaglia, E. F., Ph.D. Thesis, Physics Institute, USP (2002)Google Scholar
Chinaglia, E.F, Avanci, L.H., VIII Micromat – Materials Microscopy Congress, Campinas, São Paulo (2014)Google Scholar
Kaiser, N., Appl. Opt 41, 16, 3053 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balakrisnan, G. et al. , Materials Research Bulletin 48, 4901 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sekhara, M. C., et al. , Applied Surface Science 258, 1789 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cetin, S. S., et al. , Cryst. Res. Technol. 46, 11, 1207 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, M.H, et al. , Appl. Phys. Lett., 81, 472, doi: 10.1063/1.1487923, 2002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grüger, H., et al. , Thin Solid Films 447, 509515, 2004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, G. et al. , Surface Science 576, 67 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nam, S. et al. , Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 303, 139 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramzan, M. et al. ., Applied Surface. Science 283, 617 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tian, G., et al. , Applied Surface Science 253, 8782 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutterotti, L., et al. ., Thin Solid Films, 450, 34, (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutterotti, L., Nuclear Inst. and Methods in Physics Research, B, 268, 334, (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar