Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T15:39:18.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microstructural Evolution of Co2GaAs Thin Film on GaAs Substrate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

D.W. Shin
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, POSTECH, Pohang 790-600, Korea
C.G. Park
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, POSTECH, Pohang 790-600, Korea
J.S. Kwak
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul 120-749, Korea
H.K. Baik
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul 120-749, Korea
Get access

Abstract

Interfacial reactions and epitaxial growth of the microstructure between cobalt thin film and (100)-oriented GaAs substrate have been studied, using X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy and EDS analysis. Cobalt thin films were deposited by e-beam evaporation, and were subsequently annealed at 400 °C.

The reaction layer evolved due to the annealing was identified as the ternary phase, Co2GaAs, that was grown epitaxially on the substrate. The new orientation relationship between Co2GaAs and GaAs substrate was found as <110>Co2GaAs // <100>GaAs and {001}Co2GaAs // {011}GaAs. These results can be well explained upon matching the unit cells of Co2GaAs and GaAs. Upon the annealing at 600°C, the Co2GaAs phase is usually decomposed to stable binary phases, CoGa and CoAs.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCE

1 Oelhafen, P., Freeouf, J.L., Kuan, T.S., Jackson, T.N. and Baston, P.E., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 1, 588(1983)Google Scholar
2 Ogawa, M., Thin Soild Films 70, 181(1980)Google Scholar
3 Fontaine, C., Okumura, T. and Tu, K.N., J. Appl. Phys., 54, 1404(1983)Google Scholar
4 Yu, A. J., Galvin, G. J., Palmstrom, C. J. and Mayer, J. W., Appl/Phys. Lett, 47(9), 934(1985)Google Scholar
5 Genut, M. and Eisenberg, M., Appl. Phys. Lett., 50(19), 1358(1987)Google Scholar
6 Sands, T., Keramidas, V. G., Yu, K. M., Washburn, J. and Krishman, K., J. Appl. Phys., 62(5), 2070(1987)Google Scholar
7 Palmstrom, C. J., Chang, C. C., Yu, A., Galvin, G. and Mayer, J. W., J. Appl. Phys., 62(9), 3755(1987)Google Scholar
8 Genut, M. and Eisenberg, M., J. Appl. Phys., 66(11), 5456(1989)Google Scholar
9 Hsu, C.C., Jin, G.L., Ho, J. and Chen, WD., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 10(4), 1020(1992)Google Scholar
10 Hult, M., Whitlow, H.J., Östling, M., Andersson, M., Andersson, Y., Lindeberg, I. and Ståhl, K., J. Appl. Phys., 75(2), 835(1994)Google Scholar
11 Kwak, J.S., Baik, H.K., Shin, D.W., Park, C.G., Kim, C.S., Noh, S.K. and Kim, S.I., J. Electr. Mat., 23(12), 1335(1994)Google Scholar