Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T20:54:52.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Mechanical Properties of Common Interlevel Dielectric Films and Their Influences on Aluminum Interconnect Extrusions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Fen Chen ,
Baozhen Li ,
Timothy D. Sullivan ,
Clara L. Gonzalez ,
Christopher D. Muzzy ,
H. K. Lee ,
Mark D. Levy ,
Michael W. Dashicll  and
James Kolodzcy
Fen Chen
Affiliation:
IBM Microelectronics Division, 1000 River St., Essex Junction, VT
Baozhen Li
Affiliation:
IBM Microelectronics Division, 1000 River St., Essex Junction, VT
Timothy D. Sullivan
Affiliation:
IBM Microelectronics Division, 1000 River St., Essex Junction, VT
Clara L. Gonzalez
Affiliation:
IBM Microelectronics Division, 1000 River St., Essex Junction, VT
Christopher D. Muzzy
Affiliation:
IBM Microelectronics Division, 1000 River St., Essex Junction, VT
H. K. Lee
Affiliation:
IBM Microelectronics Division, 1000 River St., Essex Junction, VT
Mark D. Levy
Affiliation:
IBM Microelectronics Division, 1000 River St., Essex Junction, VT
Michael W. Dashicll
Affiliation:
Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE.
James Kolodzcy
Affiliation:
Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE.
Get access

Abstract

Knowledge of the mechanical properties of interlevel dielectric films and their impact on sub-micron interconnect reliability is becoming more and more important as critical dimensions in ULSI circuits are scaled down. For example, lateral aluminum (Al) extrusions into spaces between metal lines, which become a more of a concern as the pitches shrink, appear to depend partially on properties of SiO2 underlayers. In this paper, the mechanical properties of several common interlevel dielectric SiO2 films such as undoped silica glass using a silane (SiH4) precursor, undoped silica glass using a tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS) precursor, phosphosilicate glass (PSG) deposited by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) and borophosphosilicate glass (BPSG) deposited by sub-atmosphere chemical vapor deposition (SACVD) were studied. Among the four common interlevel layers, BPSG exhibits the smallest modulus (E), hardness (H) and the highest the coefficients of thermal expansion (CTE). BPSG again has the lowest as-deposited compressive stress and the lowest local Si-O-Si strain before annealing. Stress interactions between the various SiO2 underlayers and the Al metal film are further investigated. The impact of dielectric elastic properties on interconnect reliability during thermal cycles is proposed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 594: Symposium V – Thin Films - Stresses & Mechanical Properties VIII , 1999 , 421
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Nguyen, S., Dobuzinsky, D., Harmon, D., Gleason, R., and Fridman, S., J. Electrochem. Soc. 137, 2209 (1990)Google Scholar
[2] Rojas, S., Zanotti, L., Borghesi, A., Sassella, A., Pignatel, G.V., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B11, 2081 (1993)Google Scholar
[3] Murarka, S. P., Metallization: Theory and Practice for VLSI and ULSI, Butterworth- Heinemann, Boston, p231 (1993)Google Scholar
[4] Flinn, P. A., Gardner, D. S., and Niz, W. D., IEEE Trans. on Electron Devices ED34, 689, (1987)Google Scholar
[5] Rocke, M. and Schneegans, M., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B6, 1113 (1998)Google Scholar
[6] Learn, A. J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 4, 774 (1986)Google Scholar
[7] Bhushan, B., Murarka, S. P., and Gerlach, T., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 138, 1068 (1990)Google Scholar
[8] Ambrde, P., Krcller, F., Wolf, R., and Wandel, K., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B11, 614 (1993)Google Scholar
[9] Carlotti, G., Doucet, L., and Dupeux, M., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B14, 3460 (1996)Google Scholar
[10] Doucet, L. and Carlotti, G., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 356, 215 (1995)Google Scholar
[11] Ramkumar, K., Goshh, S. K., and Saxena, A. N., J. Electrochem. Soc. 140, 2669 (1993)Google Scholar
[12] Pliskin, W. A., and Lehman, H. S., J. Electrochem. Soc. 112, 1013 (1965)Google Scholar
[13] Rodbell, K. P, Svilan, V., Gignac, L. M., Dehaven, P.W., Murphy, R. J., and Licata, T. J., private communication, (1997)Google Scholar