Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T15:24:05.966Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measurements of Enhanced Diffusion of Buried Layers in Silicon Membrane Structures During Oxidation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Scott T. Dunham
Affiliation:
Boston University, Electrical, Computer and Systems Engineering Department, 44 Cummington Street, Boston, MA 02215.
Anuradha M. Agarwal
Affiliation:
Boston University, Electrical, Computer and Systems Engineering Department, 44 Cummington Street, Boston, MA 02215.
Nanseng Jeng
Affiliation:
Boston University, Electrical, Computer and Systems Engineering Department, 44 Cummington Street, Boston, MA 02215.
Get access

Abstract

Reported calculations of the diffusion coefficient of silicon self interstitials vary over several orders of magnitude at temperatures of interest for integrated circuit fabrication. In this work, we measure the enhanced diffusion of phosphorus buried layers while interstitials are injected at a wafer surface via thermal oxidation. The starting substrates were either float-zone silicon or Czochralski silicon with a pre-treatment to precipitate excess oxygen. The samples were prepared by implantation of phosphorus followed by the growth of a 40-60µm epitaxial layer. They were then etched anisotropically from the frontside or backside to yield membrane structures. Local oxidation was performed at 1100°C on either the frontside or backside of each wafer and buried layer diffusion was monitored, yielding information about interstitial diffusion in silicon and it’s dependence on bulk properties.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ahn, S. T., Shott, J. D. and Tiller, W. A., Proceedings of the Electrochemical Society Meeting, San Diego, CA, October 1986.Google Scholar
2 Scheid, E. and Chenevier, P., Phys. Stat. Solidi 93, 523 (1986).Google Scholar
3 Taniguchi, K., Antoniadis, D. A. and Matsushita, Y., Appl. Phys. Let. 42, 961 (1983)Google Scholar
4 Griffin, P. B. and Plummer, J. D., Proceedings of the Electrochemical Society Meeting, San Diego, CA, October 1986.Google Scholar
5 Taniguchi, K. and Antoniadis, D. A., Appl. Phys. Let. 46, 944 (1985).Google Scholar
6 Bronner, G. B. and Plummer, J. D., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 36, 49 (1985).Google Scholar
7 Tan, T. Y. and Gösele, U., Appl. Phys. A 37, 1 (1985).Google Scholar
8 Griffin, P. B., Fahey, P. M., Plummer, J. D. and Dutton, R. W., Appl. Phys. Let. 47, 319 (1985).Google Scholar
9 Griffin, P. B., Ahn, S. T., Tiller, W. A. and Plummer, J. D., Appl. Phys. Let. 51, 115 (1987).Google Scholar
10 Mizuo, S. and Higuchi, H., Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 20, 791 (1981).Google Scholar
11 Law, M. E. and Dutton, R. W., IEEE Trans. Comp. Aid. Des., 181 (1987).Google Scholar
12 Fahey, P., Barbuscia, G., Moslehi, M. and Dutton, R. W., Appl. Phys. Let. 43, 683 (1983).Google Scholar