Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-27T07:23:16.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Maintaining Chemically Reducing Waste-Package Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

Charles W. Forsberg
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN 37831, U.S.A.
Leslie R. Dole
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN 37831, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Most fission products and actinides in spent nuclear fuel (SNF) are trapped in the uranium dioxide (UO2) crystal structure and cannot escape until the UO2 is oxidized. Oxidation destroys the crystal structure, exposes the radionuclides to groundwater, and creates the potential for dissolution. For a repository in an oxidizing geochemical environment, the potential exists to delay the release of radionuclides for hundreds of thousands to millions of years by using a combination of excess depleted uranium dioxide and iron in the waste package (WP) to locally maintain chemically reducing conditions. This approach limits the rate of oxygen transport to the SNF after WP failure. Alternative methods of oxygen transport to the SNF were investigated, including transport by groundwater, diffusion through air, and diffusion through water.

Type
articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Forsberg, C. W. and Haire, M. J., Depleted Uranium DioxideBSteel Cermets for Spent Nuclear Fuel Multipurpose Casks, Proc. of the Fifth Topical Meeting on DOE Spent Nuclear Fuel and Fissile Materials, Charleston, South Carolina, (American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, Illinois, September 2002).Google Scholar
2. Forsberg, C. W., AEffect of Depleted-Uranium-Dioxide Particulate Fill on Spent-Nuclear-Fuel Waste Packages, Nucl. Technol. 131, 337B353 (2000).Google Scholar
3. Longcheng, L. and Neretnieks, I., AA Reactive Transport Model for Oxidative Dissolution of Spent Fuel and Release of Nuclides Within a Defective Canister, Nucl. Technol. 137 (3), 228 (2002).Google Scholar
4. Miller, B. and Chapman, N., Postcards from the Past: Archaeological and Industrial Analogs for Deep Repository Materials, Radwaste (January 1995), p. 32.Google Scholar
5. Landstroem, O. and Tullborg, E., Interactions of U, Th, REE, Ra, Cs, and Sr with Clay Minerals, Fe-oxyhydride and Calcite: Examples of Geochemical Processes in Natural Systems From the Aespoe Hard Rock Laboratory, SKB Technical Report (Studsvik Eco & Safety AB, Studsvik, Sweden, 1995).Google Scholar
6. Patoczka, J., Johnson, R., and Scheri, J., “Trace Heavy Metals Removal with Ferric Chloride,” Industrial Waste Technical Conference, Nashville, Tennessee, March 1B4, 1998.Google Scholar
7. Kessler, J. H., Roberts, G. C., Dole, L. R., and Morgan, M. T., Formulation and Durability of Tailored Cementitious Hosts Applied to TRU Waste Generated at the Rocky Flats Plant, in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VI, edited by Brookins, D. G. (North Holland, New York, 1983) pp. 611618.Google Scholar
8. McDaniel, E. W., Gilliam, T. M., Dole, L. R., and West, G. A., Weldon Springs Raffinate Pits 1, 2, 3, & 4: Preliminary Grout Development Studies for In Situ Waste Immobilization, ORNL/TM-9264 (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, April 1987).Google Scholar
9. Forsberg, C. W. and Dole, L. R., “Depleted Uranium Dioxide Waste Package for Spent Nuclear Fuel,” in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXV, Edited by McGrail, B. P. and Cragnolino, G. A. (Mat. Res. Soc., Proc. 713, Warrendale, PA, 2002). pp. 143150.Google Scholar
10. Benson, S. W., The Foundations of Chemical Kinetics (McGraw Hill, New York, 1960), p.185.Google Scholar