Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-sv6ng Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T02:51:39.466Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Magnetostriction and Crystallographic Texture in Rolled and Annealed Fe-Ga Based Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Suok-Min Na
Affiliation:
nsmv2k@glue.umd.edu, University of Maryland, Aerospace Engineering, 3181 Glenn L. Martin Hall, College Park, Maryland, 20742, United States, 301-405-1131, 301-314-9001
Alison B. Flatau
Affiliation:
aflatau@umd.edu, University of Maryland, Aerospace Engineering, United States
Get access

Abstract

Results that demonstrate the selective development of {100}<001> preferred texture in polycrystalline Fe81.3Ga18.7 plus B (0.5∼1.0 at.%) and S (∼0.05 at.%) alloys using a conventional rolling and annealing processes are presented in this work. We found that boron improved ductility by enhancing grain boundary cohesion during rolling and sulfur played an important role in controlling the surface energy and formation of the selective growth of {100} grains during annealing. The as-rolled (Fe81.3Ga18.7)+0.5 at.%B+0.005 at.%S sheet had some {100}<011> and near {111}<011> texture corresponding to α-fiber texture parallel to the rolling direction. The near {100}<001> sheet texture was formed in sheet that was annealed at 1200°C for 2h (198 ppm), while the texture of sheet annealed at 1100°C for 4h (165 ppm) was closer to {110}<001>. The maximum observed magnetostriction of 220 ppm was obtained as a result of a double annealed, first at 1000°C for 6h and then at 1200°C for 1h, with the resultant texture closer to the ideal {100}<001> than the less desirable {100}<011>.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Clark, A. E., Hathaway, K. B., Wun-Fogle, M., Restorff, J. B., Lograsso, T. A., Keppens, V. M., Petculescu, G. and Taylor, R. A.: Extraordinary magnetoelasticity and lattice softening in bcc Fe-Ga alloys. J. Appl. Phys. 93, 8621 (2003).Google Scholar
2. Srisukhumbowornchai, N. and Guruswamy, S.: Crystallographic textures in rolled and annealed Fe-Ga and Fe-Al alloys. Metall. and Mater. Trans. A 35A, 2963 (2004).Google Scholar
3. Köhler, D.: Promotion of cubic grain growth in 3% silicon iron by control of annealing atmosphere composition. J. Appl. Phys. 31, 408S (1960).Google Scholar
4. Kramer, J. J.: Nucleation and growth effects in thin ferromagnetic sheets: A review focusing on surface energy-induced secondary recrystallization. Metall. Trans. A 23, 1987 (1992).Google Scholar
5. Heo, N. H., Chai, K. H. and Na, J. G.: Correlation between interfacial segregation and surface-energy-induced selective grain growth in 3% silicon-iron alloy. Acta Mater. 48, 2901 (2000).Google Scholar
6. Na, S. M. and Flatau, A. B.: Magnetostriction and surface-energy-induced selective grain growth in rolled Galfenol doped with sulfur, in Active Materials: Behavior and Mechanics, edited by Armstrong, William D. (Proc. of SPIE 5761, Bellingham, WA, 2005) pp. 192199.Google Scholar