Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T07:26:23.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Magnetoreflection in Ion-Implanted Graphite*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

L.E Mcneil
Affiliation:
Department of Physics;
B.S. Elman
Affiliation:
Department of Physics;
M.S Dresselhaus
Affiliation:
Department of Physics; Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science;
G. Dresselhaus
Affiliation:
Francis Bitter National Magnet Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
T. Venkatesan
Affiliation:
Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
Get access

Abstract

The use of a hot stage (T ∼ 600°C) for ion implantation into graphite permits the introduction of foreign species into the host material while eliminating most of the lattice damage associated with ion implantation at room temperature. This permits the use of the magnetoreflection technique for examination of changes in the electronic band structure induced by implantation Samples of graphite implanted with 31P and 11B at various energies and fluences are examined, and the in-plane and c-axis disorder are characterized using Raman spectroscopy and Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometer (RBS) techniques. Implantation-induced changes in the electronic band structure are interpreted in terms of the Slonczewski-Weiss- McClure band model. Small changes are found relative to the band parameters that describe pristine graphite.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The work at MIT was supported by ONR Grant #N00014–;77-C-0053

References

REFERENCES

1. Mayer, J.W., Eriksson, L., and Davis, J.A., Ion Implantation in Semiconductors, (Academic Press, New York, 1970).Google Scholar
2. Slonczewski, J.C. and Weiss, P.R., Phys. Rev. 109, 272 (1958).Google Scholar
3. McClure, J.W., Phys. Rev. 108, 612 (1957);Google Scholar
2a. Phys. Rev. 119, 606 (1960).Google Scholar
4. Moore, A.W., Chemistry and Physics of Carbon, edited by Walker, P.L. and Thrower, P.A., (Dekker, New York, 1973), vol. 11, p. 69.Google Scholar
5. Calculated from the LSS theory [Lindhard, J., Scharff, M., and Schiott, H.E., Dan. Vidensk. Selsk., Mat. Fys. Medd. 33, 14 (1963)]Google Scholar
5a.and electronic stopping-power tables [Northcliffe, L.C. and Schilling, R.F., Nucl. Sect. A 7, 233 (1970)].Google Scholar
6. Tuinstra, F. and Koenig, J.L., J. Chem. Phys. 53, 1126 (1970).Google Scholar
7. Chu, W.-K., Mayer, J.W., and Nicolet, M.-A., Backscattering Spectrometry, (Academic Press, New York, 1978);Google Scholar
7a. Elman, B.S., Braunstein, G., Dresselhaus, M.S., Dresselhaus, G., Venkatesan, T., and Wilkens, B., (to be published).Google Scholar
8. Weiler, M.H., Semiconductors and Semimetals, edited by Willardson, R.K. and Beer, A.C., (Academic Press, New York, 1981);Google Scholar
8a. Weiler, M.H., Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1977 (unpublished).Google Scholar
9. Braunstein, G., Elman, B.S., Dresselhaus, G., and Venkatesan, T., (to be published).Google Scholar
10. Toy, W.W., Dresselhaus, M.S., and Dresselhaus, G., Phys. Rev. B 15, 4077 (1977).Google Scholar
11. Elman, B.S., McNeil, L., Nicolini, C., Chieu, T.C., Dresselhaus, M.S., and Dresselhaus, G., Phys. Rev. B28, (in press).Google Scholar
12. Elman, B.S., Hom, M., Maby, E.W., and Dresselhaus, M.S., Intercalated Graphite, edited by Dresselhaus, M.S., Dresselhaus, G., Fischer, J.E., Moran, M.J., (North-Holland Elsevier, New York, 1983), p. 341.Google Scholar
13. Venkatesan, T., Elman, B.S., Braunstein, G., Dresselhaus, M.S., Dresselhaus, G., (to be published).Google Scholar
14. Turnbull, J.A., Stagg, M.S., and Eeles, W.T., Carbon 3, 387 (1966);Google Scholar
14a. Lowell, C.E., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 50, 142 (1967).Google Scholar