Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T07:58:45.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Magnetic easy axis switching in ultrathin Co/Cu(110) films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

S. Hope
Affiliation:
Cavendish Laboratory, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 OHE, U.K.
E. Gu
Affiliation:
Cavendish Laboratory, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 OHE, U.K.
M. Tselepi
Affiliation:
Cavendish Laboratory, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 OHE, U.K.
J.A.C. Bland
Affiliation:
Cavendish Laboratory, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 OHE, U.K.
Get access

Abstract

We have studied the magnetic properties of the Co/Cu(110) system at 300K, using the magneto-optic Kerr effect. After a given deposition of Co in the thickness range 5ML<dCo<40ML, the M-H loop is observed to evolve continuously in time until the magnetic easy axis has switched 90° from the [001] to [1–10] direction. We attribute this behaviour to the reversal in sign of the effective in-plane uniaxial anisotropy constant, due to the adsorption of submonolayer quantities of a residual gas from the UHV environment. STM images reveal the growth of elongated Co island structures preferentially oriented along the [001] direction providing ‘step like’ edge sites for gas adsorption. We find the easy axis can be switched back to the [001] direction by depositing a submonolayer Cu overlayer, and that for relatively thick Co films (>15ML) the Cu overlayer can cause the magnetisation to take up intermediate angles. We analyse this behaviour using a simple model of the effective anisotropy energies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Weber, W., Bischof, A., Allenspach, R., Wursch, Ch., Back, C.H. and Pescia, D., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3424 (1996).Google Scholar
2. Weber, W., Back, C.H., Bischof, A., Pescia, D. and Allenspach, R., Nature. 374, 788 (1995).Google Scholar
3. Weber, W., Back, C.H., Ramsperger, U., Vaterlaus, A. and Allenspach, R., Phys. Rev. B. 52, R14400(1995).Google Scholar
4. Kief, M.T. and Egelhoff, W.F. Jr Phys. Rev. B 47, 10785 (1993).Google Scholar
5. Hillebrands, B., Fassbender, J., Jungblut, R., Guntherodt, G., Roberts, D.J. and Gehring, G.A., Phys. Rev. B 53, R10548 (1996).Google Scholar