Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T05:32:32.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Low Temperature Epitaxy of Si on Dihydride-Terminated Si (001): Energetic Versus Thermal Growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

M. E. Taylor
Affiliation:
Thomas J. Watson Laboratories of Applied Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125
Harry A. Atwater
Affiliation:
Thomas J. Watson Laboratories of Applied Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125
M. V. Ramana Murty
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Atomic and Solid State Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
Get access

Abstract

Pulsed laser deposition of Si on dihydride-terminated (l×1) Si (001) at low temperatures yields epitaxial layers, unlike molecular beam epitaxy. Si films were grown by ultrahigh vacuum pulsed laser deposition on the dihydride surface at substrate temperatures from 40 °C to 350 ° C. Epitaxial thickness and interface roughness were measured by high-resolution cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy and found to be comparable to known data for Si films grown by molecular beam epitaxy on monohydride-terminated (2×l) Si (001). Si films were grown at 200 °C by pulsed laser deposition on the dihydride surface at argon background pressures between 10 torr and 10−1 torr. Ion probe time of flight data was collected over the same pressure range. Comparison of the results suggests that loss of epitaxy is correlated with low incident energy. This, in conjunction with information on surface reconstruction obtained from reflection high-energy electron diffraction, suggests that the mechanism enabling epitaxy on the dihydride surface is Si subplantation, a mechanism only possible in growth with an energetic beam.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Shulze, G. and Henzler, M., Surf. Sci. 124, 336 (1983).Google Scholar
2. Eaglesham, D.J., Gossmann, H.-J., and Cerullo, M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1227 (1990).Google Scholar
3. Ohmi, T., Ichikawa, T., Iwabuchi, H., and Shibata, T., J. Appl. Phys. 66, 4756 (1989).Google Scholar
4. Chen, C.-C., Smith, D.L., Anderson, G.B., and Hagstrom, S.B., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 259, 443 (1992).Google Scholar
5. Murty, M.V.Ramana and Atwater, Harry A., to be published in Surf. Sci., (1997).Google Scholar
6. Geohegan, D.B., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 201, 557 (1991).Google Scholar
7. Geohegan, D.B., Laser Ablation: Mechanisms and Applications, ed. by Miller, J.C. and Haglund, R.F., Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 28 (1991).Google Scholar
8. Otis, C.E. and Goodwin, P.M., J. Appl. Phys. 73, 1957 (1993).Google Scholar
9. Weir, B.E., Freer, B.S., Headrick, R.L., Eaglesham, D.J., Gilmer, G.H., Bevk, J., and Feldman, L.C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 204 (1991).Google Scholar
10. Murty, M.V.R., Atwater, H.A., Kellock, A.J., and Baglin, J.E.E., Appl. Phys. Lett. 62, 2566 (1993).Google Scholar
11. Murty, M.V. Ramana and Harry Atwater, A., Phys. Rev. B 49, 8483 (1994).Google Scholar