Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T07:21:44.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Localization and Electric-Field Modulated Electron Spin Resonance of a Shallow Donor in Simox

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

K. Vanheusden
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
A. Stesmans
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Get access

Abstract

Low temperature electron spin resonance (ESR) measurements were carried out on a broad range of separation by implantation of oxygen (SIMOX) substrates. The post-implantation forming anneal (T 1325°C) was observed to induce a donor in the SIMOX structure, more specifically, a shallow effective mass donor in Si of axial symmetry and preferential alignment along [001], likely an oxygen-related heat-treatment donor. Controlled etching back experiments revealed that the donor defects reside in an interfacial Si layer of at least 600$$A thick at both sides of the buried oxide layer reaching a local volume density of about 1018 cm−3. In the flat band situation, the donor was observed to be in a diamagnetic, ESR non-active state. Downward sweeping of the Si energy bands near the buried oxide interfaces, relative to the Fermi level, either by in situ positive ate biasing of large area metal-oxide-silicon capacitors fabricated on the buried oxide or γ7-irradiation induced positive charging of the buried oxide, was observed to alter the ionization state of part of the donors into an ESR-active state.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Papaioannou, G., Cristoloveanu, S., and Hemment, P., J. Appl. Phys. 63, 4575 (1988).Google Scholar
2. Vettese, F., Sicart, J., Robert, J. L., Cristoloveanu, S., and Bruel, M., J. Appl. Phys. 65, 1208 (1989).Google Scholar
3. Brown, G. A. and Revesz, A. G., Abstracts Electrochem. Soc. Meeting, St. Louis (1992).Google Scholar
4. Vanheusden, K. and Stesmans, A., J. Appl. Phys. 69, 6656 (1991).Google Scholar
5. Brady, F., Li, S., and Krull, W., J. Appl. Phys. 68, 6143 (1990).Google Scholar
6. Boesch, H., Taylor, T., and Brown, G., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 38, 1234 (1991).Google Scholar
7. Zvanut, M., Stahlbush, R., Carlos, W., Hughes, H., Lawrence, R., Hevey, R., and Brown, G., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 38, 1253 (1991).Google Scholar
8. Devine, R. A. B., Leray, J-L., and Margail, L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 2275 (1991).Google Scholar
9. Stahlbush, R. E., Carlos, W. E., and Prokes, J. M., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 34, 1680 (1987).Google Scholar
10. Stesmans, A. and Vanheusden, K., to be published in Appl. Phys. Lett. (1993).Google Scholar
11. Stesmans, A., J. Magn. Res. 76, 14 (1988).Google Scholar
12. Stesmans, A., Revesz, A. G., and Hughes, H. L., J. Appl. Phys. 69, 175 (1991).Google Scholar
13. See, e.g., Deak, P., Snyder, L. C., and Corbett, J. W., Phys. Rev. B 45, 11612 (1992).Google Scholar
14. Stesmans, A., to be published in Phys. Rev. B.Google Scholar