Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T23:24:51.233Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Leaching of Warm-Pressed CsZp-Cement Composite Waste Forms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Wei Fajun ,
Michael W. Grutzeck  and
Della M. Roy
Wei Fajun
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
Michael W. Grutzeck
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
Della M. Roy
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
Get access

Abstract

Cesium zirconium phosphate [CsZr2 (PO4)3 or CsZP] has been mixed with various cement matrix materials, warm pressed, cured and leached at different temperatures. Although hydrated portland cement minerals can immobilize most of U, La and Nd (as proxies for transuranics) they are less effective in immobilizing Cs, Sr or Ba under ordinary conditions. Earlier published work showed favorable immobilization of Cs in CsZP-cement composite waste forms which compared rather favorably with many other waste forms with respect to Cs leachability. By using warm pressing combined with suitable admixtures rates of 28 to 60 day Cs leachability or the composites have been substantially reduced, attaining values of less than 0.20 g/m2. d.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 44: Symposium N – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VIII , 1984 , 899
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Roy, D.M., ‘Cement Based Nuclear Waste Solidification Forms, pp. 479– 516 in Proc. Conf. on High-Level Radioactive Solid Waste Forms, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Denver, CO, Dec. 18–21, 1978), Ed. Casey, L., NUREG/CP-0005 (Apr. 1979).Google Scholar
2. Roy, D.M. and Gouda, G.R., “High Level Radioactive Waste Incorporation into (Special) Cements,’ Nucl. Technol. 40, pp. 214–219 (1978).Google Scholar
3. Moore, J.G., Godbee, H.W., and Kibbey, A.H., ‘Leach Behavior of Hydrofracture Grout Incorporating Radioactive Wastes,” Nucl. Technol. 32, p. 39 (1977).Google Scholar
4. Roy, D.M., Scheetz, B.E., Grutzeck, M.W., Sarkar, A.K., and Atkinson, S.D., “A Low Temperature Ceramic Radioactive Waste Form,” pp. 136–142, in Proc. Intl. Symp. Ceramics in Nuclear Waste Management, Cincinnati, OH (Apr. 30-May 2, 1979), Eds. Chikalla, T.D. and Mendel, J.E., Nudl. Div., Am. Ceram. Soc. and U.S.D.O.E., Conf.-790420 (1979).Google Scholar
5. McCulloch, C.E., Rahman, A.A., Angus, M.J., Glasser, F.P., and Crawford, R.W., ‘Immobilization of Cesium in Cement Containing Reactive Silica and Pozzolans,” pp. 413–428 in Advances in Ceramics, Nuclear Waste Management, Vol.8, Eds. Wicks, G.G. and Ross, W.A., Am. Ceramic Soc., Columbus, OH (1984).Google Scholar
6. Komarneni, S. and Roy, D.M., “Tobermorites: A New Family of Cation Exchangers,’ Science 221, pp. 647–648 (12 Aug. 1983).Google Scholar
7. Roy, D.M., Fajun, Wei, and Grutzeck, M.W., “NZP-Cement Composite Waste Forms,” pp. 401–405 in Advances in Ceramics, Nuclear Waste Management, Vol. 8, Eds. Wicks, G.G. and Ross, W.A., Am. Ceramic Soc., Columbus, OH (1984).Google Scholar
8. Hespe, E.D., “Leach Testing of Immobilized Radioactive Waste Solids–A Proposal for a Standard Method,” Atomic Energy Rev. 9, pp. 195–207 (1971).Google Scholar