Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T19:22:03.153Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Layer Splitting by H-Ion Implantation in Silicon: Lower Limit on Layer Thickness?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

C. Qian
Affiliation:
INRS-Énergie et Matériaux, Université du Québec1650 Boul. Lionel-Boulet, C.P. 1020, Varennes, Québec J3X 1S2, Canada, qian@inrs-ener.uquebec.ca, terreau@inrs-ener.uquebec.ca
B. Terreault
Affiliation:
INRS-Énergie et Matériaux, Université du Québec1650 Boul. Lionel-Boulet, C.P. 1020, Varennes, Québec J3X 1S2, Canada, qian@inrs-ener.uquebec.ca, terreau@inrs-ener.uquebec.ca
Get access

Abstract

The Smart-Cut™ process and its variants involve H and/or He ion implantation and annealing to neatly exfoliate a layer of material as thin as the ion range. At low ion energy, as required for further miniaturisation, several effects may inhibit the process. We implanted undoped Si (100), (110) and (111) with 5 keV H or D ions at doses below (3–4×1016/cm2) or above (5.5×1016/cm2) the critical dose for blistering. The samples were either isochronally annealed for 1h or 2h in three steps at 500, 550 and 600°C, or subjected to thermal desorption spectroscopy (TDS) with linear ramps of 7.5 K/min up to 500, 550 or 600°C. The surface morphology was observed at each step by scanning electron or atomic force microscopy. Below the critical blistering dose, TDS only shows a broad high temperature (∼525°C) peak, while above that dose, a low temperature peak (∼360°C) also appears, though weakly in the case of (110) samples. The exfoliated area (as % of total surface) increases with temperature, and also varies with wafer orientation, being minimum for (110) samples and maximum for (111) samples. This orientation effect is much more pronounced for H-implants than for D-implants. All these trends indicate that ion channelling leads to an inhibition of exfoliation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bruel, I. M., Electron. Lett. 31, 1201(1995); Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B 108, 313(1996).Google Scholar
2. Weldon, M. K., Marsico, V. E., Chabal, Y. J., Agarwal, A., Eaglesham, D. J., Sapjeta, J., Brown, W. L., Jacobson, D. C., Caudano, Y., Christman, S. B. and Chaban, E. E., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 15, 1065(1997).Google Scholar
3. Terreault, B., J. Nucl. Mater. 93 & 94, 707(1980).Google Scholar
4. Bourque, G. and Terreault, B., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B 140, 13(1998).Google Scholar
5. Chabal, Y. J., private communication.Google Scholar
6. Agarwal, A., Haynes, T. E., Venezia, V. C., 0. Holland, W. and Eaglesham, D. J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 1086(1998).Google Scholar