Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T11:28:04.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Kinetics of Oxidation of Ni Aluminide Exposed to Oxygen-Sulfur Atmospheres

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

K. Natesan*
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Ave., Argonne, IL 60439
Get access

Abstract

As part of a development effort on nickel aluminides based on Ni3Al as structural materials for fossil energy applications, oxidation/sulfidation studies are being conducted at Argonne National Laboratory on materials that are being developed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Sheet samples of nickel aluminide, containing 23.5 at, % Al, 0.5 at. % Hf, and 0.2 at. % B were tested in an annealed condition and after preoxidation treatments. Continuous weight-change measurements were made at 875°C by a thermogravimetric technique in exposure atmospheres of air, a low-p02 gas mixture, and low-p02 gas mixtures with several levels of sulfur. getailed analyses of the corhosion product scale layers were conducted using a scanning electron microscope equipped with an energy dispersive x-ray analyzer and an electron microprobe. The air-exposed specimens developed predominantly nickel oxide; the specimen exposed to a low-p02 environment developed an aluminum oxide scale. As the sulfur content of the gas mixture increased, the alumina scale exhibited spallation and the alloy tended to form nickel sulfide as the reaction phase. The results indicated that the sulfidation reaction in nickel aluminide specimens (both bare and preoxidized) was determined by the rate of transport of nickel from the substrate through the scale to the gas/alumina scale interface, mechanical integrity of the scale, and the H2S concentration in the exposure environment.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Pope, D.P. and Ezz, S.S., Intl. Metals Reviews 29(3), 136 (1984).Google Scholar
2. Grala, E.M., in Mechanical Properties of Intermetallic Compounds, edited by Westbrook, J.H. (John Wiley, New York, 1960), p. 358.Google Scholar
3. Moskovich, R., J. Mater. Sci. 13, 1901 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Aoki, K. and Izumi, O., Trans. Japan Inst. Metals 19, 203 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. White, C.L. and Stein, D.F., Metall. Trans. A 9A, 13(1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Aoki, K. and Izumi, O., Nippon Kinzaku Gakkaishi, 43, 1190 (1979).Google Scholar
7. Liu, C.T. and Koch, C.C., Technical Aspects of Critical Materials Used by the Steel Industry, Vol. IIB, NBSIR 83-2679-9, National Bureau of Standards (1983).Google Scholar
8. Liu, C.T., White, C.L., Koch, C.L., and Lee, E.H., Proc. Symp. High-Temperature Materials Chemistry II, edited by Munir, Z.A., Electrochemical Society (1983).Google Scholar
9. Liu, C.T., White, C.L., and Horton, J.A., Acta Metall. 33(2), 213(1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Natesan, K., Argonne National Laboratory report ANL/FE-87-1, to be published.Google Scholar