Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T08:39:02.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Investigation of Quasi-Breakdown Mechanism in Ultrathin Gate Oxides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Hao Guan
Affiliation:
CICFAR, Department of Electrical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119260
Y. D. He
Affiliation:
CICFAR, Department of Electrical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119260
M. F. Li
Affiliation:
CICFAR, Department of Electrical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119260
Byung Jin Cho
Affiliation:
CICFAR, Department of Electrical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119260
Zhong Dong
Affiliation:
Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing Ltd., Singapore 738406
Get access

Abstract

The conduction mechanism of quasi-breakdown (QB) for ultra-thin gate oxide has been studied in dual-gate CMOSFET with a 3.7 nm thick gate oxide. Systematic carrier separation experiments were conducted to investigate the evolutions of gate, source/drain, and substrate currents before and after gate oxide QB. Our experimental results clearly show that QB is due to the formation of a local physically-damaged-region (LPDR) at Si/SiO2 interface. At this region, the effective oxide thickness is reduced to the direct tunneling (DT) regime. The observed high gate leakage current is due to DT electron or hole currents through the region where the LPDR is generated. Under substrate injection stress condition, there is several orders of magnitude increase of Isub(Is/d) at the onset point of QB for n(p) - MOSFET, which mainly corresponds to valence electrons DT from the substrate to the gate. Consequently, cold holes are left in the substrate and measured as substrate current. Under gate injection stress condition, there is sudden drop and even change of sign of Isub(Is/d) at the onset point of QB for n(p)-MOSFET, which corresponds to the disappearance of impact ionization and the appearance of hole DT current from the substrate to the gate. In the LPDR region, the damaged structure may have two or multi metastable states corresponding to different effective oxide thickness. The thermal transition between two or multi metastable states leads to random telegraph switching noise (RTSN) fluctuation between two or multi levels.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Lee, S. H., Cho, B. J., Kim, J. C. and Choi, S. H., IEDM Tech. Dig., p. 605 (1994).Google Scholar
2.Okada, K., Kawasaki, S., and Hirofuji, Y., Ext. Abst. of 1994 lnt. Conf. Solid State Devices and Materials, p.565 (1994).Google Scholar
3.Depas, M., Nigam, T., and Heyns, Marc M., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 43, p. 1499 (1996).Google Scholar
4.Okada, Kenji, Taniguchi, Kenji, Appl. Phys. Lett., 70, p.351, (1997).Google Scholar
5.Yoshida, T., Miyazaki, S., and Hirose, M., Ext. Abst. of 1996 Int. Conf. Solid State Devices and Materials, p. 539 (1996).Google Scholar
6.Tomita, T., Utsunomiya, H., Sakura, T., Kamakura, Y., and Taniguchi, K., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 46, p.159 (1999).Google Scholar
7.Crupi, F., Degraeve, R., Groeseneken, G., Nigam, T., and Maes, H. E., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices., 45, p.2,329 (1998).Google Scholar
8.Houssa, M., Nigam, T., Mertens, P. W. and Heyns, M. M., Appl. Phys. Lett., 73, p.514 (1998).Google Scholar
9.Miranda, E., Sune, J., Rodriguez, R., Nafris, M. and Aymerich, X., Appl. Phys. Lett., 73, p.490 (1998).Google Scholar
10.Ginovker, A. S.,Gristsenko, V. A. and Sinitsa, S. P., Phys.Stat.Sol. (a), 26, p.489 (1974).Google Scholar
11.Eitan, B. and Kolodny, K., Appl. Phys. Lett., 43, p.106 (1983).Google Scholar
12.Yao, L. D., Liou, F. T. and Chen, S., IEEE Electron Device Lett., 4, p.261 (1983).Google Scholar
13.Chang, C., Hu, C. and Brodersen, R. W., J. Appl. Phys., 57, p.302 (1985).Google Scholar
14.Shi, Y., Ma, T. P., Prasad, S. and Dhanda, S., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 45, p.2355 (1998).Google Scholar