Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-18T22:55:04.261Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interaction of in Atom Spin-Orbit States with Si(100) Surfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Doeke J. Oostra
Affiliation:
Joint Institute for Laboratory Astrophysics, University of Colorado and National Institute of Standards and Technology, and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309
Russell V. Smilgys
Affiliation:
Joint Institute for Laboratory Astrophysics, University of Colorado and National Institute of Standards and Technology, and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309
Stephen R. Leone
Affiliation:
Staff member, Quantum Physics Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Get access

Abstract

Scattering and desorption of In from Si(100) is investigated. Laser induced fluorescence is used to probe the desorbing and or scattered species. Auger Electron Spectroscopy is used to study the composition on the surface. The results show that at surface temperatures below 820 K a two dimensional layer of In desorbs by a half order mechanism. This is explained by assuming two dimensional In islands on the surface. Above 820 K, desorption takes place by a first order mechanism. The desorption para-meters appear to be spin-orbit state specific. The desorption energy for In 2P3/2 is 2.8 ± 0.4 eV and for In 2P½ 2.5 ± 0.2 eV. The difference is equal to the difference in the spin-orbit energy. So far no specular scattering of In is observed, suggesting that the sticking coefficients are unity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Carleton, K. L., Bourguignon, B., Smilgys, R. V., Oostra, D. J., and Leone, S. R., presented at the 1988 MRS Spring Meeting, Reno, NV, 1988.Google Scholar
2. Zinke-Allmang, M. and Feldman, L. C., Surf. Sci. 191, L749 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Bourguignon, B., Smilgys, R. V., and Leone, S. R., Surf. Sci. 204, 473 (1988).Google Scholar
4. Bourguignon, B., Carleton, K. L., and Leone, S. R., Surf. Sci. 204, 455 (1988).Google Scholar
5. Carleton, K. L. and Leone, S. R., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B5, 1141 (1987).Google Scholar
6. Ota, Y., J. Appl. Phys. 51, 1102 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Bean, J. C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 33, 654 (1978).Google Scholar
8. Knall, J., Sundgren, J.-E., Hansson, G. V., and Greene, J. E., Surf. Sci. 166, 512 (1986) and ref. 1 and 2 cited herein.Google Scholar
9. Oostra, D. J., Smilgys, R. V., and Leone, S. R., (in preparation).Google Scholar
10. Kern, R., Lay, G. Le, and Metois, J. J., in Current Topics in Materials Science, Vol 3, edited by Kaldis, E., (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1979) p.Google Scholar
11. De Sarkar, G., Landman, U., and Rasolt, M., Phys. Rev. B21, 3256 (1980).Google Scholar
12. Korzeniewski, G., Hood, E., and Metiu, H., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 20, 594 (1982).Google Scholar
13. Carleton, K. L., Bourguignon, B., and Leone, S. R., Surf. Sci. 199, 442 (1988).Google Scholar