Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:01:58.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interaction between Lattice Dislocations and Grain Boundaries in Ordered Compounds: Theory and Experiment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

B. J. Pestman
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Physics, Materials Science Centre, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 18, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
J. Th. M. De Hosson
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Physics, Materials Science Centre, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 18, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands
V. Vitek
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, U.S.A
F.D. Tichelaar
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy, Technological University of Delft, Rotterdamseweg 137, 2628 AL Delft, The Netherlands
F.W. Schapink
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy, Technological University of Delft, Rotterdamseweg 137, 2628 AL Delft, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

The interaction between a screw dislocation and symmetric [1 1 0] tilt boundaries under the influence of an applied shear stress was investigated by atomistic simulation. Many-body potentials representing Cu and Ni3Al were used for the description of the interatomic forces. A comparison will be made with in-situ observations in a transmission electron microscope of the interaction of screw dislocations with a coherent twin boundary.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Balluffi, R. W., Brokman, A. and King, A. H., Acta Metall. 30, 1453, (1982).Google Scholar
2. Ackland, G. I., Tichy, G., Vitek, V. and Finnis, M. W., Phil. Mag. A 56, 735, (1987).Google Scholar
3. Sutton, A. P. and Vitek, V., Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London ser. A 309, 37, (1983).Google Scholar
4. Vitek, V., Sutton, A. P., Smith, D. A. and Pond, R. C., Grain Boundary Structure and Kinetics, ASM, Metals Park, Ohio (1980).Google Scholar
5. Basinski, Z. S., Duesbery, M. S. and Taylor, R., Phil. Mag. 21, 1201, (1970).Google Scholar
6. Vitek, V., Perrin, R. C. and Bowen, D. K., Phil. Mag. 21, 1049, (1970).Google Scholar
7. Mori, T. and Tangri, K., Met. Trans. 10A, 733 (1979).Google Scholar
8. Yamaguchi, M., Paidar, V., Pope, D. P. and Vitek, V., Phil. Mag. A 45, 867, (1979).Google Scholar
9. Farkas, D. and Savino, E. J., Scripta Metall. 22, 557, (1988).Google Scholar
10. Tichelaar, F. D. and Schapink, F. W., Phil. Mag. A (1990),in press.Google Scholar
11. Pestman, B. J., Hosson, J. Th. M. De, Vitek, V. and Schapink, F. W., Scripta Metall. 23, 1431, (1989).Google Scholar
12. Pestman, B. J., Hosson, J. Th. M. De, Vitek, V. and Schapink, F. W., in Atomic Sal Calculation of Structure in Materials, edited by Schluter, M. A. and Daw, M. S., (Mat. Res. Soc. Symup. Proc., to be published).Google Scholar