Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T07:51:27.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Initial Stage Hydrogen Movement and IR Absorption Proportionality Constants In Hot-Wire Deposited SiN1.2:H During High-Temperature Annealing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

H.D. Goldbach
Affiliation:
Utrecht University, SID – Physics of Devices, PO. BOX 80 000, 3508 TA Utrecht, The Netherlands
V. Verlaan
Affiliation:
Utrecht University, SID – Physics of Devices, PO. BOX 80 000, 3508 TA Utrecht, The Netherlands
C.H.M. van der Werf
Affiliation:
Utrecht University, SID – Physics of Devices, PO. BOX 80 000, 3508 TA Utrecht, The Netherlands
W.M. Arnoldbik
Affiliation:
Utrecht University, SID – Physics of Devices, PO. BOX 80 000, 3508 TA Utrecht, The Netherlands
H.C. Rieffe
Affiliation:
ECN Solar Energy, PO. Box 1, NL 1755 ZG Petten, The Netherlands
I.G. Romijn
Affiliation:
ECN Solar Energy, PO. Box 1, NL 1755 ZG Petten, The Netherlands
A.W. Weeber
Affiliation:
ECN Solar Energy, PO. Box 1, NL 1755 ZG Petten, The Netherlands
R.E.I. Schropp
Affiliation:
Utrecht University, SID – Physics of Devices, PO. BOX 80 000, 3508 TA Utrecht, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

Silicon nitride (SiNx:H) layers were deposited using a high deposition rate Hot-Wire CVD technique (up to 5 nm/s) and their application as passivating antireflection coating on multicrystalline silicon solar cells was investigated. An important aspect is the hydrogen release and diffusion during a short annealing treatment at temperatures well above the deposition temperature. Such annealing treatments (firing) are used during contact formation of multicrystalline solar cells.

A series of SiNx:H layers with Si/N ratio in the range of 0.7-1.45 was first characterized using optical R/T measurements, Fourier Transformed Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and Elastic Recoil Detection (ERD) to determine optical constants n and k, Si-H, N-H and Si-N bond densities, Si-H peak position and H content. To get more insight in the passivation process during firing, which takes place at roughly 800 °C, samples with a N/Si ratio of 1.2 were annealed at this temperature for different times (15 s – 10 min). The total bonded H content, measured with FTIR, using conventional proportionality constants as proposed by Lanford and Rand [1], seems to show an increase within the first 60 s. At longer annealing times, the bonded H content decreases, as expected. The behavior of the H content under annealing measured by FTIR and ERD can be explained by using different matrix elements for calculating the H content from the FTIR data. The matrix element for the N-H stretching mode (3343 cm-1) was determined to be (4.7±0.2)x1020 cm-2 while the Si-H stretching (2193 cm-1) was found to be (0.55±0.04)x1020 cm-2. Such high matrix elements for the N-H stretching mode have not been reported earlier. The value of the Si-H stretching mode matrix element is within the reported values for different back bonding scenarios, but low for a peak position of 2193 cm-1. The ratio between the matrix elements of 8.5 differs strongly from the ratio of 2 observed by Lanford [1] or Bohne [2].

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lanford, W.A and Rand, M.J. J. Appl. Phys. 49 (1978) p.2473 10.1063/1.325095Google Scholar
2 Bohne, W., Fuhs, W., Rohrich, J., Selle, B., Gonzalez-Diaz, G., Martil, I., Martinez, F.L., Prado, A. del. Surf. Interface Anal. 30, (2000) p. 534 10.1002/1096-9918(200008)30:1<534::AID-SIA832>3.0.CO;2-C3.0.CO;2-C>Google Scholar
3 Holt, J.K., Goodwin, D.G., Gabor, A.M., Jiang, F., M.Stavola, Atwater, H.A., Thin Solid Films 430 (2003) p. 37 10.1016/S0040-6090(03)00131-7Google Scholar
4 Szlufcik, Duerinckx J., Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C. 72 (2002) p. 231 Google Scholar
5unpublishedGoogle Scholar
6 Schropp, R.E.I, Feenstra, K.F., Molenbroek, E.C., Meiling, H. and Rath, J.K., Philos. Mag B 76 (1997) p.309 10.1080/01418639708241096Google Scholar
7 Brodsky, M. H., Cardona, M., Cuomo, J.J.. Phys. Rev. B 16, 8 (1977), p.3556 Google Scholar
8 Maley, N. Phys. Rev. B 46, 4 (1992), p. 2078 10.1103/PhysRevB.46.2078Google Scholar
9 Werf, C.H.M. van der, Goldbach, H.D., Loffler, J., Scarfo, A., Kylner, A.M.C., Stannowski, B., Arnoldbik, W.M, Weeber, A.,Rieffe, H., Soppe, W.J., Rath, J.K., Schropp, R.E.I, to be published in Thin Solid FilmsGoogle Scholar
10 Bustarret, E., Bensouda, M., Habrard, M.C., Bruyere, J.C., Poulin, S., Gujrathi, S.C., Phys. Rev. B 35 (1988) p. 8171 10.1103/PhysRevB.38.8171Google Scholar
11 Giorgis, F., Giuliani, F., Pirri, C.F., Tresso, E., Summonte, C., Rizzoli, R., Galloni, R., Desalvo, A., Rava, P.., Philos. Mag. B 77 (1998) p. 925 10.1080/13642819808206395Google Scholar
12 Schuurmann, F., PhD thesis Utrecht University 1998 Google Scholar
13 Boehme, C., Lucovsky, G., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 299-302 (2002) p. 1157 10.1016/S0022-3093(01)01135-8Google Scholar
14 Park, Y B., Rhee, S W. J. Mater. Sci.-Mater. El. 12 (2001) p. 515 10.1023/A:1012449425744Google Scholar
15 Martinez, F.L., Prado, A. del, Bravo, D., Lopez, F.J. and Martil, I. J. Appl.Phys. 88 (2000) p.2149 10.1063/1.1305548Google Scholar
16 Hasegawa, S., He, L., , Amano, and Inokuma, T. Phys. Rev. B 48 (1993) p. 5315 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.5315Google Scholar