Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T08:18:59.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Redox Environments on the Geochemical Behaviour of Radionuclides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

G. Bidoglio
Affiliation:
Commission of the European Communities, Joint Research Centre, Ispra Establishment, Radiochemistry and Nuclear Chemistry Division, 21020 ISPRA (VA) Italy
A. Avogadro
Affiliation:
Commission of the European Communities, Joint Research Centre, Ispra Establishment, Radiochemistry and Nuclear Chemistry Division, 21020 ISPRA (VA) Italy
A. De Plano
Affiliation:
Commission of the European Communities, Joint Research Centre, Ispra Establishment, Radiochemistry and Nuclear Chemistry Division, 21020 ISPRA (VA) Italy
Get access

Abstract

Studies were carried out on the effect of redox conditions on the release from simulated vitrified HLW of Np-237, Pu-238 and Tc-99 and their migration through columns packed with site-specific porous material representative of clay and salt aquifers. Results obtained under oxic and anoxic conditions are compared. The release rates of Np, Pu and Tc were found to be lower in the absence of air than with oxygenated groundwaters. Speciation studies showed that neptunium and technetium were released in the oxidized forms Np(V) and Tc(VII) even under the investigated anoxic conditions where reduced species are thermodynamically more stable. In spite of that, a stronger interaction was observed when the leachate was passed through the column in the absence of air. A surface reduction process accounts for the observed behaviour. Under more reducing conditions, plutonium appears to be present in the tetravalent state in colloidal form.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Becking, L.G.M. Baas, Kaplan, I.R., Moore, D., J. Geol. 68, 243 (1960)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Lanza, F., Bidoglio, G., Zamorani, E., presented at the International Seminar on Radioactive Waste Products, Jülich, June 1985 (to be published in the proceedings)Google Scholar
3. Antonini, M., Merlini, A.E., Thornley, R.F., J. non Cryst. Solids 71, 219 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Bidoglio, G., Chatt, A., Plano, A. De, Zorn, F., J. Radioanal. Chem. 79, 153 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Coles, D.G., Apted, M.J., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VII, edited by McVay, G.L. (Elsevier Science Publishers, New York, 1984), pp. 129136; M.Y. Khalil, W.B. White, in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VII, edited by G.L. McVay (Elsevier Science Publishers, New York, 1984), pp. 655–662Google Scholar
6. Allard, B., in Actinides in Perspective, edited by N.M., Edelstein (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1982), p. 553 Google Scholar
7. Gourisse, D., Report CEA-N-1441, 1971 Google Scholar
8. Vandergraaf, T.T., Ticknor, K.V., George, I.M., in Geochemical Behaviour of Disposed Radioactive Waste, edited by Barney, G.S., Navratil, J.D., Schulz, W.W. (ACS Symposium Series 246, 1984) p. 25 Google Scholar
9. Meyer, R.E., Arnold, W.D., Case, F.I., ORNL Report No. 5978, 1984 Google Scholar