Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T14:16:29.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Ohmic Contacts on Semi-Insulating GaAs Detector Performances

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

A. Castaldini ,
A. Cavallini ,
C. Canali ,
C. Chiossit ,
C. Del Papa ,
F. Nava  and
C. Lanzieri
A. Castaldini
Affiliation:
IJNFM and Dept. of Physics, Univ. Bologna, Italy
A. Cavallini
Affiliation:
IJNFM and Dept. of Physics, Univ. Bologna, Italy
C. Canali
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, Univ. Modena, Italy also at INFN
C. Chiossit
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, Univ. Modena, Italy also at INFN
C. Del Papa
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, Univ. Udine, Italy also at INFN
F. Nava
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, Univ. Modena, Italy also at INFN
C. Lanzieri
Affiliation:
ALENIA S.p.A. Roma, Italy
Get access

Abstract

Ohmic contact has been observed to play an important role in the performances ofLiquid Encapsulated Czochralski gallium arsenide particle detectors since it is possible to control the injection of charge carriers which determines the device performances. Alloyed and implanted contacts characteristics have been compared to relate the presence of electrically active defects induced during contact preparation to the final detector efficiency. In-situ optical probing investigations have been carried out to analyze the electric field distribution. Spectroscopic investigations show that the contact fabrication process significantly influences the trap density, whilst it does not change their type.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 406: Symposium L – Diagnostic Techniques for Semiconductor Materials Processing , 1995 , 431
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Alietti, M., Canali, C., Castaldini, A., Cavallini, A., Cetronio, A., Chiossi, C., D'Auria, S., Papa, C. del, Lanzieri, C., Nava, F. and Vanni, P., Nucl. Instr. Meth. in Phys. Res. A362, p. 344–348 (1995).Google Scholar
2. Nava, F., Alietti, M., Canali, C., Cavallini, A., Papa, C. del, Re, V. and Lanzieri, C., submitted to IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 1995 Google Scholar
3. Nava, F. in Proc. of the 20th Workshop ofthe INFN Eloisatron Project on GaAs Detectors and Electronics for High-Energy Physics, edited by Papa, C. del, Pelfer, P.G. and Smith, K. (World Scientific Singapore 1992), p.121,129.Google Scholar
4. Braslau, N., Gunn, J.B. and Staples, J.L., Solid-State Electron. 10, 38 (1967).Google Scholar
5. Donolato, C., App. Phys. Lett., 43, p. 120–122 (1983).Google Scholar
6. Holt, D.B. in SEM Microcharacterizationof Semiconductors, edited by Holt, D.B. and Joy, D.C. (Academic Press London, 1989), p. 241–338.Google Scholar
7. Wilson, T. and Sheppard, C., Scanning Optical Microscopy, Academic Press, London 1984, pp.45–65.Google Scholar
8. Look, D.C., Electrical Characterization of GaAs Material and Devices, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1989 (1983).Google Scholar
9. Mooney, P., J. Appl. Phys. 54, p. 208–213 (1983).Google Scholar
10. Sze, S.M., Physics of Semiconductors Devices, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1981.Google Scholar
11. Donoval, D., Barus, M. and Zdimal, M., Solid-State Electron. 34, p. 1365–1373 (1991).Google Scholar
12. McGregor, D.S., Knoll, G.F., Eisen, Y. and Brake, R. in Proc. of the 20th Workshop of the INFN Eloisatron Pro iect on GaAs Detectors and Electronics for High-Energy Physics, edited by Papa, C. del, Pelfer, P.G. and Smith, K. (World Scientific Singapore 1992), p. 30–43.Google Scholar
13. Manifacier, J.C. and Henisch, H.K., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 41, p. 1285 (1980).Google Scholar
14. Dubecky, F. and Olejniová, B., J. Appl. Phys. 69, p. 1769–1771 (1991).Google Scholar
15. Berwick, K., Brozel, M.R., Buttar, C.M, Cowperthwaite, M. and Hou, Y., in Defect Recognition and Image Processing in Semiconductors and Devices Proc. of the Fifth Int. Conference, edited by J. Jimdnez (Inst. Phys. Conf Series 135, Bristol 1993), p. 305–3 10.Google Scholar
16. Castaldini, A., Cavallini, A., Papa, C. del, Alietti, M., Canali, C., Nava, F. and Lanzieri, C.., Scanning Microscopy, 8 p. 969–978 (1994).Google Scholar
17. McGregor, D.S., Rojeski, R.A., Knoll, G.F., Terry, F.L Jr., East, J. and Eisen, Y., J. Appl. Phys. 75 (12), p. 7910–7915 (1994).Google Scholar
18. Tapiero, M., Bbenjelloun, N., Zeilinger, J.P., Hamd, S. El and Noguet, C., J. Appl. Phys. 64, p. 4006–4012 (1988).Google Scholar