Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T14:24:33.367Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Deposition Conditions on the optical and Electronic Properties of a-Ge:H

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

W. Paul ,
S. J. Jones ,
F. C. Marques ,
D. Pang ,
W. A. Turner ,
A. E. Wetsel ,
P. Wickboldt  and
J. H. Chen
W. Paul
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Division of Applied Sciences, Cambridge, MA 02138
S. J. Jones
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Division of Applied Sciences, Cambridge, MA 02138
F. C. Marques
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Division of Applied Sciences, Cambridge, MA 02138
D. Pang
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Division of Applied Sciences, Cambridge, MA 02138
W. A. Turner
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Division of Applied Sciences, Cambridge, MA 02138
A. E. Wetsel
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Division of Applied Sciences, Cambridge, MA 02138
P. Wickboldt
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Division of Applied Sciences, Cambridge, MA 02138
J. H. Chen
Affiliation:
Boston College, Department of Physics, Chestnut Hill, MA 02167
Get access

Abstract

We have measured the optical absorption edge spectra for absorption coefficients between 1 and 105 cm-1, the photoluminescence spectra at 77 K, the conductivity-temperature relations, and the photoconductivity magnitude and spectral dependence for a series of r.f. glow discharge films of a-Ge:H. The films were deposited at the powered cathode and unpowered anode of a diode capacitive reactor having very different electric fields and plasma conditions, while substrate temperature, H2 dilution of a GeH4 plasma and applied r.f. power were varied. The structure of the films are radically different, with the anode-deposited films displaying a microstructure of low density material (voids) and the cathode-deposited films displaying homogeneity similar to that of device-quality a-Si:H. A self consistent explanation of the differences in measured optical and electronic properties is given, taking full account of the structural observations. From this analysis the conditions required for the production of a-Ge:H of good photoelectronic quality may be inferred. Preliminary structural, optical and photoelectronic data for a-Si1.x Gex :H of large x, prepared under conditions extrapolated from the a-Ge study, indicate significant improvements from current data in the literature.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 219: Symposium A – Amorphous Silicon Technology - 1991 , 1991 , 211
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 For early reviews, see Amorphous and Liquid Semiconductors, edited by Tauc, J. (Plenum, New York, 1974).Google Scholar
2 An extensive review of the properties of optimized unhydrogenated a-Ge:H is given in work by Paul, W., Connell, G.A.N. and Temkin, R.J., Adv. Phys. 22, 529(1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Chittick, R.C., Alexander, J.H. and Sterling, H.F., J. Electrochem. Soc. 116, 77 (1969).Google Scholar
4 Spear, W.E. and LeComber, P.G., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 8–10, 727 (1972).Google Scholar
5 LeComber, P.G. and Spear, W.E., Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 509 (1970).Google Scholar
6 Spear, W.E. and LeComber, P.G., Solid State Commun. 17, 1193 (1975);Google Scholar
Carlson, D.E. and Wronski, C.R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 28, 671 (1976).Google Scholar
7 Lewis, AJ., Connell, G.A.N., Paul, W., Pawlik, J.R. and Temkin, R.J., A.I.P. Conf. Proc. 20, 27 (1974).Google Scholar
8 Triska, A., Dennison, D. and Fritzsche, H., Bull. Am. Phy. Soc. 20, 392 (1975).Google Scholar
9 Lewis, A.J., Phys. Rev. B14, 658 (1976);Google Scholar
Connell, G.A.N. and Pawlik, J.R., Phys. Rev. B13, 787 (1976).Google Scholar
10 Chevallier, J., Wieder, H., Onton, A. and Guarnieri, C.R., Solid State Commun. 26, 867 (1977);Google Scholar
Marfaing, Y., in Proc. 2nd E.C. PVSEC. edited by Reidel, D. (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1979), p. 287.Google Scholar
11 Paul, W. in Fundamental Physics of Amorphous Semiconductors, edited by Yonezawa, F. (Springer Series in Solid State Sciences 25, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1980), p. 72;Google Scholar
Paul, D.K., von Roedem, B., Oguz, S., Blake, J. and Paul, W., J. Phys. Soc. Japan 49, 1261 (1980);Google Scholar
Hauschildt, D., Fisher, R. and Fuhs, W., Phys. Stat. Solidi (b) 102, 563 (1980);Google Scholar
Karg, F., Kruhler, W., Moller, M. and von Klitzing, K., J. Appl. Phys. 60, 2016 (1986);Google Scholar
Street, R.A., Tsai, C.C., Stutzmann, M. and Kakalios, J., Phil. Mag. B56, 289 (1987);Google Scholar
Aljishi, S., Chu, V., Smith, Z.E., Shen, D.S., Conde, J.P., Slobodin, D., Kolodzey, J. and Wagner, S., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 97/98, 1023 (1987);Google Scholar
Mackenzie, K.D., Burnett, J.H., Eggert, J.R., Li, Y.M. and Paul, W., Phys. Rev. B38, 6120 (1988);Google Scholar
Stutzmann, M., Street, R.A., Tsai, C.C., Boyce, J.B. and Ready, S.E., J. Appl. Phys. 66, 569 (1989);Google Scholar
Wagner, S., Chu, V., Conde, J.P. and Liu, J.Z., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 114, 453 (1989);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuhs, W. and Finger, F., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 114, 387 (1989), and references therein. For additional papers on a-si1 x Gex :H alloys, see Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 192 (MRS, Pittsburgh, 1990).Google Scholar
12 See, for example, Matsuda, A. and Tanaka, K., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 97/98, 1367 (1987).Google Scholar
13 Paul, W. in Amorphous Silicon and Related Materials, edited by Fritzsche, H. (World Scientific, New Jersey, 1989), p. 63;Google Scholar
Fortman, C.M. in Amorphous Silicon Technology, edited by Madan, A., Thompson, M.J., Taylor, P.C., LeComber, P.G. and Hamakawa, Y. (Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 118, Pittsburgh, 1988), p. 691.Google Scholar
14 Yan, P., Lichtin, N.N. and Morel, D.L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 50, 1367 (1987);Google Scholar
Slobodin, D., Aljishi, S. and Wagner, S. in Plasma Processing and Synthesis of Materials, edited by Apelian, D. and Szekely, J. (Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 98, Pittsburgh, 1987), p. 291;Google Scholar
Marques, F.C. and Chambouleyron, I. in Proc. 9th E.C. PVSEC. edited by Palz, W., Wrixon, G.T. and Helm, P. (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1989), p. 1042;Google Scholar
Martin, D., Schroder, B., Leidner, M. and Ochsner, H., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 114, 537 (1989);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aoki, T., Kato, S., Nishikawa, Y. and Hirose, M., J. Non-Cryst Solids 114, 798 (1989);Google Scholar
Karg, F.H., Bohm, H. and Pierz, K., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 114, 477 (1989);Google Scholar
Turner, W.A., Jones, S.J., Pang, D., Bateman, B.F., Chen, J.H., Li, Y.M., Marques, F.C., Wetsel, A.E., Wickboldt, P., Paul, W., Bodart, J., Norberg, R.E., El Zawawi, I. and Theye, M.L., J. Appl. Phys. 67, 7430 (1990);Google Scholar
Godet, C., Chu, V., Equer, B., Bouizem, Y., Chahed, L., El Zawawi, I., Theye, M.L., Basour, S., Bruyere, J.C. and Stoquert, J.P. in Amorphous Silicon Technology-1990, edited by Taylor, P.C., Thompson, M.J., LeComber, P.G., Hamakawa, Y. and Madan, A. (Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 192, Pittsburgh, 1990), p. 163;Google Scholar
Karg, F.H., Hirschauer, B., Kasper, W. and Pierz, K., to be published in Solar Energy Materials (1991).Google Scholar
15 Rudder, R.A., Cook, J.W. and Lucovsky, G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 43, 871 (1983);Google Scholar
Payson, J.S. and Ross, R.C., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 77/78, 579 (1985).Google Scholar
16 Turner, W.A., Jones, S.J., Pang, D., Bateman, B.F., Chen, J.H., Li, Y.M., Marques, F.C., Wetsel, A.E., Wickboldt, P., Paul, W., Bodart, J., Norberg, R.E., El Zawawi, I. and Theye, M.L., J. Appl. Phys. 67, 7430 (1990).Google Scholar
17 Our earlier review (reference 11) had, in fact, already set out in some detail the argument for a microstructural explanation for the deteriorated properties of a-Ge:H and a-Si1−x Gex:H alloys compared with a-Si:H.Google Scholar
18 Turner, W.A., Pang, D., Wetsel, A.E., Jones, S.J., Paul, W. and Chen, J.H. in Amorphous Silicon Technology-1990, edited by Taylor, P.C., Thompson, M.J., LeComber, P.G., Hamakawa, Y. and Madan, A. (Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 192, Pittsburgh, 1990), p. 493;Google Scholar
Paul, W., Jones, S.J. and Turner, W.A., Phil. Mag. B63, 247 (1991);Google Scholar
Paul, W., Jones, S.J., Turner, W.A. and Wickboldt, P., submitted to J. Non-Cryst. Solids;Google Scholar
Jones, S.J., Turner, W.A., Pang, D. and Paul, W., presented at MRS Fall Meeting 1990, to be published.Google Scholar
19 Mackenzie, K.D., Eggert, J.R., Leopold, D.J., Li, Y.M., Lin, S. and Paul, W., Phys. Rev. B31, 2198 (1985).Google Scholar
20 For an account of our experiments with Reactor 2, where Ts, H2 dilution, gas pressure, gas flow, r.f. power and electrode spacing were varied, see Wickboldt, P., Jones, S.J., Marques, F.C., Pang, D., Turner, W.A., Wetsel, A.E., Paul, W. and Chen, J.H., submitted to Phil. Mag. B.Google Scholar
21 Connell, G.A.N., Temkin, R.J. and Paul, W., Adv. Phys. 22, 643 (1973).Google Scholar
22 Theye, M.L., Optics Commun. 2, 329 (1970); Mat. Res. Bull. 6, 103 (1971).Google Scholar
23 We presume to call it “intrinsic” since, as far as we know, the edge is at least as sharp as any heretofore published for either a-Ge:H or a-Si:H.Google Scholar
24 For the same film depositions, the E0's estimated from steady state photoconductivity measured by CPM ranged between 40 and 55 meV, with 15 of the 16 at 50 meV or smaller.Google Scholar
25 Guha, S., Payson, J.S., Agarwal, S.C. and Ovshinsky, S.R., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 97/98, 1455 (1987);Google Scholar
Haku, H., Sayama, S., Nakashima, Y., Takahama, T., Isomura, M., Tarui, H., Hishikawa, Y., Tsuda, S., Nakano, S., Ohnishi, M. and Kuwano, Y., J. Appl. Phys. 26, 1978 (1987);Google Scholar
Wagner, S., Chu, V., Conde, J.P. and Liu, J.Z., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 114, 453 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26 We do not attempt an estimation of defect density by integration of α(hv) as is often done, as we believe this procedure to be flawed. See Li, Y.M. and Paul, W., this volume.Google Scholar
27 For these anode films, the steady-state photoconductivity is too low to permit an accurate evaluation of Eo from CPM measurements.Google Scholar
28 Our PL system (and procedures) have been described in Anderson, D.A., Moddel, G., Collins, R.W. and Paul, W., Solid State Commun. 31, 677 (1979). Excitation is by the 1.96 eV radiation from a HeNe laser with an illumination intensity of 100 mW/cm2. Our inability to observe PL in the anode films may be due to the sensitivity of our system, since earlier we were unable to detect PL in samples of a-Ge:H prepared at Marburg and measured by Carius before being supplied to us. Our detectivity limit is about a factor of 10 below the intensities measured for the cathode films. We note that it is the difference between our anode and cathode films which is significant for our present purposes.Google Scholar
29 Carius, R. in Amorphous Silicon and Related Materials, edited by Fritzsche, H. (World Scientific, New Jersey, 1989), p. 939.Google Scholar
30 If we assume that a mobility gap of 1.13 eV is obtained from a plot of (agra;hv)1/2 vs hv, the relaxation below the gap would be approximately 0.33 eV.Google Scholar
31 TS between 100 and 300o C; H2/GeH4 ratios between 10:1 and 40:1; power density at the cathode of Reactor 1 between 0.06 and 0.3 W/cm2; power density at the cathode of Reactor 2 between 0.25 and 0.65 W/cm2.Google Scholar
32 Li, Y.M., Turner, W.A., Lee, C. and Paul, W. in Amorphous Silicon Technology-1989, edited by Madan, A., Thompson, M.J., Taylor, P.C., Hamakawa, Y. and LeComber, P.G., (Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 149, Pittsburgh, 1989), p. 187.Google Scholar