Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T07:25:27.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Annealing on Crystallinity and Conductivity of p-type Nanocrystalline Si films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Durga P. Panda
Affiliation:
Microelectronics Research Center, Iowa State University, ASC1, Ames, Iowa, 50011
Vikram Dalal
Affiliation:
vdalal@iastate.eduIowa State UniversityElectrical and Comp. Engr.Coover HallAmesIowa50014United States
Get access

Abstract

Nanocrystalline p-type Si:H layers are important for photovoltaic and MOSFET devices. A high conductivity in these layers leads to better voltages in PV devices and to lower series resistance in both PV and MOSFET devices. The lower resistance results in higher channel mobility in MOSFET devices and higher fill factors in PV devices. In this work, we discuss the improvement in conductivity and crystallinity of p-type nanocrystalline Si:H layers by the use of post-deposition annealing. The p layers were deposited at ~ 180C from mixtures of silane, hydrogen, helium and diborane using ECR plasma deposition techniques. It was found that addition of He to H at first improved both the conductivity and crystallinity, but too much He led to an amorphous phase and lower conductivity. The as-grown films were measured for their crystallinity using both Raman spectroscopy and x-ray diffraction. The conductivity and activation energies were also measured. The films were then successively annealed at temperatures of 250, 300, 350 and 400C. The crystallinity and grain size were found to increase as the annealing temperature increased. The greatest relative increase was during the initial annealing stages. The conductivity of the films increased significantly as a consequence of the annealing. Conductivities as large as 20 S/cm were obtained in very thin films (~50-150 nm). The corresponding activation energies were in the range of 0.03 eV. When these annealed layers were used for MOSFET and PV devices, there was an appreciable increase in performance characteristics.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lumelsky, V., Shur, M. S., and Wagner, S., IEEE Sensors J. 1, 41 (2001).Google Scholar
2. Gates, S. M., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 467, 843 (1997).Google Scholar
3. Cheng, I-C. and Wagner, S.: IEE Proc.- Circuits Devices Syst., Vol 150, No. 4, 2003.Google Scholar
4. Sazonov, A., Striakhilev, D., Lee, C-Z, Nathan, A., Proceedings of the IEEE 93, No. 8, (2005).Google Scholar
5. Spear, W. E. and LeComber, P. G., Philos. Mag. 33, 935 (1976).Google Scholar
6. Kanicki, J., Hassan, E., Griffith, J., Takamori, T., and Tsang, J. C., Mater.Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 149, 239 (1989).Google Scholar
7. He, S. S., Williams, M. J., Stephens, D. J., and Lucovsky, G., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 164–166, 731 (1993).Google Scholar
8. Alpium, P. and Chu, V., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, Vol. 21, No.4, 1048 (2003).Google Scholar
9. Conde, J. P., Alpuim, P., and Chu, V., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 715, A3.1.1 (2002).Google Scholar
10. Willeke, G., in Amorphous and Microcrystalline Semiconductor Devices, edited by Kanicki, J., (Artech House, Norwood, Massachussets, 1992), Vol. II, pp. 5588.Google Scholar
11. Dalal, Vikram L., Welsh, Matt, Noack, Max and Zhu, J. H., IEE Proc.-Circuits, Devices and Syst. 150, 316(2003)Google Scholar
12. Bustarret, E., Hachinia, M.A., and Brunnel, M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 52, 1675 (1988)Google Scholar
13. Klug, H. P. and Alexander, L.E., X-Ray Diffraction Procedure (Wiley, New York, 1974)Google Scholar
14. Jiang, X. L., Lee, Y. L., and Zhu, H.L., J Phys: Condens Matter 6 (1994) pp 713718 Google Scholar