Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T17:06:22.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Aging Processes on Adhesion Properties of Metallic and Oxidic Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

C. R. Ottermann
Affiliation:
SCHOTT GLASWERKE, R & D, D-55127 Mainz, Germany
Y. Tomita
Affiliation:
HOYA CORPORATION, R & D, Tokyo 196, Japan
M. Ishiyama
Affiliation:
HOYA CORPORATION, R & D, Tokyo 196, Japan
K. Bange
Affiliation:
SCHOTT GLASWERKE, R & D, D-55127 Mainz, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Adhesion of oxidic and metallic films with thicknesses between 40 nm and 350 nm has been investigated by means of a scratch-test method based on a vibrating diamond micro-indenter. SiO2 and TiO2 films are precipitated on fused silica substrates by sol-gel techniques (SG), reactive evaporation (RE), reactive low-voltage ion plating (IP), and plasma impulse chemical vapour deposition (PICVD), and Cr-layers are produced by rf magnetron sputtering (SP). The influence of aging effects on film adhesion is investigated in respect of several conditions, like storage under ambient surroundings with differences in relative humidity or temperature treatment. A method is presented allowing control of the long-term stability of the scratch-test conditions. Temperature treatment up to 600 °C is found to have the most significant impact on adhesion properties. Adhesion increases for some SiO2 films, whereas for TiO2 layers an opposite behavior is observed. Here, the adhesion of the originally amorphous titania films is reduced due to the phase transition to polycrystalline anatase, which correlates with a significant increase in film stress.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Bange, K. et al., BMFT-Abschlußbericht, FKZ 13N 5476/6 (1991)Google Scholar
[2] Ottermann, C. R. and Bange, K., (in preparation)Google Scholar
[3] Gürtler, K., Jeschkowski, U. and Conrath, E., Proc. SPIE 1019, 184 (1986)Google Scholar
[4] Otto, J. et al., Proc. SPIE 1323, 39 (1990)Google Scholar
[5] Ottermann, C., Tadokoro, N., Tomita, Y. and Bange, K. in Thin Films: Stress and Mechanical Properties IV. edited by Townsend, P. H., Weihs, T. P., Sanchez, J. E. Jr and Borgesen, P. (Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 308, Pittsburgh, PA, 1993) pp. 627634; C. Ottermann, J. Otto, U. Jeschkowski, O. Anderson, M. Heming and K. Bange, Proc. SPIE, pp. 69–75Google Scholar
[6] Schröder, H., Phy. Thin Films 5, 87 (1969)Google Scholar
[7] Baba, S., Kikuchi, A. and Kinbara, A., J. Vac. Sci. Techn. A4, 3059 (1986); A5,1860 (1987)Google Scholar
[8] Pulker, K. H., Coatings on glass. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1984)Google Scholar