Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T11:35:12.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In Situ Stress Measurements of Co-Based Multilayer Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Young-Suk Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Yusung-Gu, Taejon 305-701, Korea
Sung-Chul Shin
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Yusung-Gu, Taejon 305-701, Korea
Get access

Abstract

We have constructed an apparatus for in situ measurement of stress of the film prepared by sputtering using an optical non-contact displacement detector. A change of the gap distance between the detector and the substrate, caused by stress of a deposited film, was detected by a corresponding change of the reflectivity. The sensitivity of the displacement detector was 5.9 µV/Å and thus, it was turned out to be good enough to detect stress caused by deposition of a monoatomic layer. The apparatus was applied to in situ stress measurements of Co/X(X=Pd or Pt) multilayer thin films prepared on the glass substrates by dc magnetron sputtering. At the very beginning of the deposition, both Co and X sublayers have subjected to their own intrinsic stresses. However, when the film was thicker than about 100 Å, constant tensile stress in the Co sublayer and compressive stress in the X sublayer were observed, which is believed to be related to a lattice mismatch between the matching planes of Co and X.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Chappert, C. and Bruno, P., J. Appl. Phys. 64, 5736(1988).Google Scholar
2. Campbell, D. S., in Handbook of Thin Film Technology, edited by Maissel, L. I. and Glang, R. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1970), p. 12–12.Google Scholar
3. Klockholm, E., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 40, 1054(1969).Google Scholar
4. Klockholm, E., IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG-12, 819(1976).Google Scholar
5. Stoney, G. G., Proc. Roy. Soc. London A82, 172(1909).Google Scholar
6. Awano, H., Suzuki, Y., Yamazaki, T., Katayama, T., and Itoh, A., J. Appl. Phys. 68, 4569(1990).Google Scholar
7. Broeder, F. J. A. den, Hoving, W., and Bloemen, P. J. H., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 93, 562(1991).Google Scholar