Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T21:32:36.767Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In Situ Diagnostics Of Epitaxial Growth Using Reflectance-Difference

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Lars Samuelson
Affiliation:
Department of Solid State Physics, University of Lund, Box 118, S-221 00 LUND, Sweden
Jan JÖnsson
Affiliation:
Department of Solid State Physics, University of Lund, Box 118, S-221 00 LUND, Sweden
Gert Paulsson
Affiliation:
Department of Solid State Physics, University of Lund, Box 118, S-221 00 LUND, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

Optical in situ methods are becoming of increasing importance for studies of the mechanisms of growth and for real-time control of surface processes involved in epitaxial growth. We present data from studies, using the reflectance-difference (RD) method, of different processes related to epitaxial growth of GaAs (001) from arsine (AsH3) and from triethylgallium (TEG). RD studies make it possible to follow how the near-equilibrium, Ga-rich, configuration of the GaAs (001) surface changes with temperature and we show how the transformation to this state can be followed from As-saturated as well as from Ga-saturated surfaces. From the initial slope of the RD-transient, corresponding to the AsH3 reaction with a Ga-stabilized surface, the temperature dependence of the catalytic effect of this surface on the decomposition of arsine is measured. Of special significance for an atomic layer epitaxial process (ALE) is the demonstration of a self-limiting reaction of TEG. This process can be followed as the surface modifies itself from a state obtained by exposure to excess TEG to the near-equilibrium Ga-terminated reconstruction. Finally, we demonstrate how pulsing sequences for the realization of ALE can be followed and controlled in real time using RD as a diagnostic tool.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Neave, J. H., Joyce, B. A., Dobson, P. J. and Norton, N., Appl. Phys. A31 (1983) 1 Google Scholar
2. Aspnes, D. E., Harbison, J. P., Studna, A. A. and Florez, L. T. Appl. Phys. Lett. 52 (1988) 957 Google Scholar
3. Aspnes, D. E., Bhat, R., Colas, E., Florez, L. T., Harbison, J. P., Kelly, M. K., Keramidas, V. G., Koza, M. A. and Studna, A. A., Proc of SPIE 1037 (1989)2 Google Scholar
4. Jönsson, J., Deppert, K., Jeppesen, S., Paulsson, G., Samuelson, L. and Schmidt, P., Appl. Phys. Lett., 56 (1990) 2414 Google Scholar
5. Schmidt, P., Deppert, K., Jeppesen, S., Jönsson, J., Paulsson, G. and Samuelson, L., J. Crystal Growth 105 (1990) 306 Google Scholar
6. Paulsson, G., Deppert, K., Jeppesen, S., Jönsson, J., Samuelson, L. and Schmidt, P., J. Crystal Growth 105 (1990) 312 Google Scholar
7. Jönsson, J., Deppert, K., Jeppesen, S., Paulsson, G., Samuelson, L. and Schmidt, P., to be published in J. Crystal Growth (1991)Google Scholar
8. Chiu, T. H., Tsang, W. T., Cunningham, J. E. and Robertson, A. Jr., J. Appl. Phys. 62 (1987)2302 Google Scholar
9. Samuelson, L., Deppert, K., Jeppesen, S., Jönsson, J., Paulsson, G. and Schmidt, P., to be published in J. Crystal Growth (1991)Google Scholar