Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T21:50:50.183Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improvements in the Hardness of Surgical Titanium Alloys by Ion Implantation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

Piran Sioshansi  and
Richard W. Oliver
Piran Sioshansi
Affiliation:
Spire Corporation, Patriots Park, Bedford, MA 01730
Richard W. Oliver
Affiliation:
Spire Corporation, Patriots Park, Bedford, MA 01730
Get access

Abstract

Titanium is generally recognized as one of the most biocompatible metal species, and as such, titanium based alloys are among the top contenders for the material of choice in orthopaedic prostheses. The questionable wear performance of titanium in abrasive and adhesive wearing conditions has been an impediment for a more widespread use of the alloy up to now. The ion implantation process has been shown to be extremely effective, in laboratory experiments, in enhancing the wear performance of the metal and at the same time reducing the wear of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) mating surface in contact with the alloy.

The present paper focuses on the increased hardness of the Ti-6Al-4V alloy as a result of ion implantation. It is generally believed that the wear improvements of titanium as a result of ion implantation are directly proportional to increased hardness of the surface. Thus, hardness data can be useful for the screening of ion implantation parameters to identify the optimum processing conditions. The Knoop hardness of ion implanted Ti-6Al-4V samples has been measured for B, C, N, N2, O and Ne ion species.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 55: Symposium G – Biomedical Materials , 1985 , 237
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Sioshansi, P., Oliver, R. W., Matthews, F., JVST A 3(6) 2670 (1985).Google Scholar
2. Williams, J. M. and Buchanan, R. A., Mat. Sci. and Eng. 69 237 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Hohmuth, K. and Rauschenbach, B., Mat. Sci. & Eng. 69 489 (1985).Google Scholar
4. Vardiman, R. G. and Kant, R. A., J. Appl. Phys. 53 (1) 690 (1982).Google Scholar
5. Hutchings, R. and Oliver, W. C., Wear, 92 143 (1983).Google Scholar
6. Martinella, R., Grovanard, S., Chevallard, G., Villani, M. and Molinari, A., Tosello, C., Mat. Sci. & Eng. 69 247 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Oliver, W. C., Hutchings, R., Pethica, J. B., Paradis, E. L. and Shuskus, A. J., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 27 (1984).Google Scholar
8. Dearnaley, G. and Goode, P. D., Nucl. Inst. and Meth. 189 117 (1981).Google Scholar
9. Jata, K. V., Han, J. G., Starke, E. and Legg, K., Scripto Met. 17 479 (1983).Google Scholar
10. Oliver, W. C., Hutchings, R. and Pethica, J. B., Met. Trans. A. 15A 2221 (1984).Google Scholar