Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T02:54:00.895Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Importance of Transient Nucleation and Non-Equilibrium Viscosity for Glass Formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Kenneth F. Kelton
Kenneth F. Kelton*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Washington University St. Louis, Missouri 63130
Get access

Abstract

The process of nucleation and growth in glasses and undercooled liquids is modeled by directly simulating the evolution of the molecular cluster distribution under both isothermal and non-isothermal conditions. Results of that simulation for the nucleation rate during the quench, and for the number of nuclei produced and the volume fraction transformed at the end of the quench are presented. The following three points are discussed: (1) The importance of transient, or non-steady state, nucleation rates on glass formation is assessed by considering three model glass forming systems: lithium disilicate, a relatively good glass former, and two metallic glasses, (Au85Cu15)77Si9Gd14 and Au81Si19. (2) Using experimentally determined values for the steady state nucleation rates and growth velocities for Pd40Ni40P20, it is demonstrated that, in agreement with recent experimental results, this alloy may be cycled at rates on the order of 1 K/sec between the melting and glass transition temperatures without crystallization. Transient effects are shown to be unimportant under these conditions in this system. (3) The effect on glass formation of a non-equilibrium viscosity during the quench due to configurational freezing is evaluated by assuming a phenomenological model for the changing viscosity.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 57: Symposium I – Phase Transitions in Condensed Systems--Experiments and Theory , 1985 , 255
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chen, H. S., Kimerling, L. C., Poate, J. M., Brown, W. L. (1978). Appl. Phys. Lett. 32, 461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drehman, A. and Greer, A. L. (1984). Acta Metall. 32, 323.Google Scholar
Greer, A. L. (1982). Acta Metall. 30, 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kashchiev, D. (1969). Surf. Sci. 14, 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelton, K. F., Greer, A L. and Thompson, C. V. (1983). J. Chem. Phys. 79, 6261.Google Scholar
Kelton, K. F. and Greer, A. L. (1984). In “Proc. of the 5th Int. Conf. on Rapidly Quenched Metals” (Wuirzburg, September 3–7).Google Scholar
Kelton, K. F. and Greer, A. L. (1986). J. Non-Cryst. Solids in press.Google Scholar
Kui, H. W. and Turnbull, D. (1985). Appl. Phys. Lett. 47, 796.Google Scholar
Kui, H. W., Greer, A. L., and Turnbull, D. (1984). Appl. Phys. Lett. 45, 615.Google Scholar
Taub, A. I.and Spaepen, F. (1980). Acta Metall. 28, 1781.Google Scholar
Turnbull, D and Cohen, M. H. (1961). J. Chem. Phys. 34, 120.Google Scholar
Vreeswijk, J. C. A., Gossink, R. G., and Stevels, J. M. (1974). J. Non-Cryst. Solids 16, 15.Google Scholar
Yinnon, H. and Uhlmann, D. R. (1982). J. Non-Cryst. Solids 50, 189.Google Scholar