Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-17T17:07:24.081Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Hyrkkölä Native Copper Mineralization: a Natural Analogue for Copper Canisters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

Nuria Marcos Perea
Nuria Marcos Perea*
Affiliation:
Helsinki University of Technology, Engineering Geology & Geophysics Lab, FIN-02150 Espoo, FINLAND
Get access

Abstract

The Hyrkkölä U-Cu mineralization is located in south-western Finland, near the Palmottu analog site, in crystalline, metamorphic bedrock. The age of the mineralization is estimated to be between 1.8 and 1.7 Ga. The existence of native copper and copper sulfides in open fractures in the near-surface zone allows us to study the native copper corrosion process in conditions analogous to a nuclear fuel waste repository.

From the study of mineral assemblages or paragenesis, it appears that the formation of copper sulfide (djurleite, Cu1.934S) after native copper (Cu°) under anoxic (reducing) conditions is enhanced by the availability of dissolved hydrogen sulfide (HS) in the groundwater circulating in open fractures in the near-surface zone. The minimum concentration of HS in the groundwater is estimated to be of the order of 10-5 M (∼ 10-4 g/1) and the minimum pH value not lower than about 7.8 as indicated by the presence of calcite crystals in the same fracture.

The present study is the first one performed on occurrences of native copper in reducing, neutral to slightly alkaline groundwaters. Thus, the data obtained is of most relevance in improving models of anoxic corrosion of copper canisters.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 465: Symposium II – Scienfific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XX , 1996 , 1153
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Korzhinskii, D.S., Physicochemical Basis of the Analysis of the Paragenesis of Minerals, New York: Consultants Bureau (1959).Google Scholar
2. Potter, R.W., Econ. Geol. 72, p. 1524 – 1542, (1977).10.2113/gsecongeo.72.8.1524Google Scholar
3. Snellgrove, R.A. and Barnes, L.H., in Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, v. 55., p. 484, (1974).Google Scholar
4. Mason, B., Principles of Geochemistry, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, (1966).Google Scholar
5. Ahonen, L., Report YJT-95–19, (1995), (Helsinki, Nuclear Waste Commission of Finnish Power Companies).10.1016/B978-081551381-0.50004-XGoogle Scholar
6. Pitkänen, P., Snellman, M., and Leino-Forsman, H., Report YJT-92–30, (1992), (Helsinki, Nuclear Waste Commission of Finnish Power Companies).Google Scholar
7. Blomqvist, R., Pilviö, R., Ahonen, L., and Ruskeeniemi, T., Geol. Surv. Finland, Rep. YST-78 (1992), p. 32–67.Google Scholar