Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T12:03:03.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hydrothermal Interactions of Cement or Mortar with Zeolites or Montmorillonites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Sridhar Komarneni
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
Della M. roy
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
Get access

Abstract

Concretes, grouts, clays and/or zeolites are candidate borehole, shaft or tunnel plugging materials for any nuclear waste repository. Interactions between these plugging materials may take place under mild hydrothermal conditions during the life of a repository. Class H cement or mortar (PSU/WES mixture) was reacted with one of two montmorillonites, clinoptilolite or mordenite at 100° and 200°C for different periods under a confining pressure of 30 MPa. The solid reaction products were characterized by x-ray powder diffraction and scanning electron microscopy after the hydrothermal treatments. When zeolites were in contact (not intimate mixture) with class H cement, they did not seem to alter but clinoptilolite altered to analcime, and mordenite became poorly crystalline in the presence of mortar (containing NaCl) at both 100° and 200°C. When cement or mortar was intimately mixed with zeolites or montmorillonites and reacted hydrothermally, the reaction resulted in the formation of Al substituted tobermorite (11Å type) in all cases (this type of reaction is expected at the interface) at both 100° and 200°C. The mechanism of tobermorite formation includes the decomposition of zeolites or montmorillonites in the presence of alkaline (pH ≃ 12) cement or mortar and recrystallization to form Al substituted tobermorite. Cesium sorption measurements in 0.01N CaCl2 on the reaction products revealed that selective Cs sōrption increased in most cases, even though little or none of the original zeolites and montmorillonites remained in the products. For example, Cs sorption Kd (mL/g) increased from 80 in the untreated mortar + Ca montmorillonite mixture to 1700 in the interaction product which is Al substituted tobermorite. Thus, we discover here that Al substituted tobermorite has good selectivity for Cs.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Interagency Review Group on Nuclear Waste Management. Report to the President by the Interagency Review Group on Nuclear Waste Management. U.S. Govt. Rept. TID–294442 (1979).Google Scholar
2. Klingsberg, C. and Duguid, J., Status of technology for isolating high-level radioactive wastes in geological repositories. U.S. Dept. Energy Rept. DOE/TIC–11207 (draft) (1980). 62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Klingsberg, C. and Duguid, J., Amer. Sci. 70, 182 (1982).Google Scholar
4. Cohen, B.L., Sci. Amer. 236, 21 (1977).Google Scholar
5. McCarthy, G.J., White, W.B, Roy, R., Scheetz, B.E., Komarneni, S., Smith, D.K., and Roy, D.M., Nature 273, 217 (1978).Google Scholar
6. Komarneni, S., Freeborn, W.P., and Smith, C.A., Amer. Mineral. 64, 650 (1979).Google Scholar
7. Komarneni, S. and Roy, R., Nucl. Tech. 54, 118 (1981).Google Scholar
8. Komarneni, S. and Roy, D.M., Clays and Clay Minerals (submitted) (1982).Google Scholar
9. Diamond, S., White, J.L., and Dolch, W.L., Amer. Mineral. 51, 388 (1966).Google Scholar
10. Komarneni, S. and Roy, D.M., Cement and Concrete Research 11, 789 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Kalousek, G.L. and Roy, R., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 40, 236 (1957).Google Scholar
12. Mumpton, F.A. and Clayton, W. Ormsby in: Natural Zeolites, Occurrence, Properties, Use, Sand, L.B. and Mumpton, F.A., Eds. (Pergamon Press, Oxford and New York 1978) pp. 113–132.Google Scholar
13. Sakiyama, H. and Mitsuda, T., Cement and Concrete Research 7, 681 (1977).Google Scholar
14. Komarneni, S., Roy, D.M. and Roy, R., Cement and Concrete Research 12,773 (1982).Google Scholar