Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T17:17:23.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hydrogenated Amorphous Silicon/Aluminum Interaction at Low Temperatures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

M. Shahidul Haque
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
H. A. Naseem
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
W. D. Brown
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
S. S. Ang
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Get access

Abstract

Annealing effects on the Al/a-Si:H structure in the temperature range 100°C to 300°C have been studied. Aluminum was evaporated on device quality phosphorous doped n+ a-Si:H films deposited in a UHV-PECVD system. The transmission line model (TLM) technique was used to measure the sheet resistance and contact resistivity of the films. For samples where Al covered the entire a-Si:H surface during annealing, sheet resistance and contact resistivity were found to decrease monotonically with annealing temperature. On the other hand, samples annealed after patterning Al pads showed a minimum in sheet resistance and contact resistivity at temperatures between 170°C and 200°C with a steep increase beyond 250°C. Optical and scanning electron microscopy, as well as surface profilometry, were used to study the surface morphology. A simple model involving Al interaction with the a-Si:H at the surface is proposed to explain the electrical behavior.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Grovenor, C.R.M., Microelectronic Materials, Adam Hilger, 1989.Google Scholar
2. Ishihara, S., Kitagawa, M., and Hirao, T., J. Appl. Phys., 62(3), p837, (1987).Google Scholar
3. Robertson, A. E., Hultman, L. G., Hentzell, H. T. G., Hornstrom, S. E., and Shaofang, G., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 5(4), pl447, (1987).Google Scholar
4. Tsai, C. C., Nemanich, R. J., Thompson, M. J., and Stafford, B. L., Physica B, 117, p953, (1983).Google Scholar
5. Schropp, R. E. I., Veitkamp, J. W. C., Snijder, J., and Verwey, J. F., IEEE Trans. Elec. Dev., ED-32(9). pl757, (1985).Google Scholar
6. Berger, H. H., Solid St. Elec, 15, p145, (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Reeves, G. K. and Harrison, H. B. et al., IEEE Elec. Dev. Lett., EDL–3(5), p111, (1982).Google Scholar
8. Ishihara, S., Hirao, T., Mori, K., Kitagawa, M., Ohno, M., and Kohiki, S., J. Appl. Phys., 53(5), p3909, (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Shannon, J. M., Appl. Phy. Lett., 24, p369, (1974).Google Scholar
10. Shannon, J. M., Appl. Phy. Lett., 25, p75, (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Krishna, K. V., Guha, S., and Narasimhan, K. L., Solar Cells, 4, p153, (1981).Google Scholar
12. Ameziane, E. L., Khaidar, M., Bennouna, A., Abouelaoualim, A., and Essafti, A., Solar & Wind Technology, 6(5), p569, (1989).Google Scholar