Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T23:22:14.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hydrogen Collision Model of The Staebler-Wronski Effect: Microscopics and Kinetics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Howard M. Branz*
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 1617 Cole Blvd., Golden, CO 80401, hbranz@nrel.gov
Get access

Abstract

A new microscopic and kinetic model of light-induced metastability in hydrogenated amorphous silicon (a-Si:H) is described. Recombination and trapping of photoinduced carriers excite hydrogen from deep Si-H bonds into a mobile configuration, leaving a dangling bond (DB) defect at the site of excitation. Normally, mobile H are recaptured at DB defects and no metastability or net DB production results. However, when two mobile H collide, they form a metastable two-hydrogen complex and leave two spatially-uncorrelated Staebler-Wronski DBs. Thermal and light-induced annealing occur when mobile H are excited from the metastable two-H complex; they diffuse and are recaptured to DBs. The microscopic model is entirely compatible with electron-spin-resonance results showing neither DB-DB nor DB-H spatial correlation of the light-induced DBs. The model leads to new differential equations describing the evolution of the mobile H and DB densities. These equation equations explain the observed room-temperature Ndb∼G2/3t1/3 dependence of DB creation upon the electron-hole pair creation rate (G) and time. The model also accounts for both t1/3-kinetics at 4.2K and t1/2-kinetics under laser-pulse soaking. Neither of these results can be explained within the prevailing electron-hole pair recombination model.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Staebler, D. L. and Wronski, C. R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 31, 292 (1977).Google Scholar
2 Dersch, H., Stuke, J., and Beichler, J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 38, 456 (1981).Google Scholar
3 Fritzsche, H., in Amorphous and Microcrystalline Silicon Technology-1997, 467, edited by Schiff, E. A., Hack, M., Wagner, S., Schropp, R., and Shimizu, I. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1997), p. 19.Google Scholar
4 Stutzmann, M., in Amorphous and Microcrystalline Silicon Technology-1997, 467, edited by Schiff, E. A., Hack, M., Wagner, S., Schropp, R., and Shimizu, I. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1997), p. 37.Google Scholar
5 Branz, H. M., unpublished.Google Scholar
6 Yamasaki, S. and Isoya, J., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 164–166, 169 (1993).Google Scholar
7 Kamei, T., Hata, N., Matsuda, A., Uchiyama, T., Amano, S., Tsukamoto, K., Yoshioka, Y., and Hirao, T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 2380 (1996).Google Scholar
8 Stutzmann, M., Jackson, W. B., and Tsai, C. C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 45, 1075 (1984).Google Scholar
9 Stradins, P. and Fritzsche, H., Phil. Mag. B 69, 121 (1994).Google Scholar
10 Tzanetakis, P., Kopidakis, N., Androulidaki, M., Kalpouzos, C., Stradins, P., and Fritzsche, H., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 198–200, 458 (1996).Google Scholar
11 Branz, H. M., Solid-State Commun. 105/6, 387 (1998).Google Scholar
12 Biswas, R., Li, Q., Pan, B. C., and Yoon, Y., Phys. Rev. B 57, 2253 (1998).Google Scholar
13 Branz, H. M., Asher, S. E., and Nelson, B. P., Phys. Rev. B 47, 7061 (1993).Google Scholar
14 Biswas, R. and Pan, B. C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 371 (1998).Google Scholar
15 For consistency with previous work [5,11], the rate constant kc is defined to be lower by a factor of 2 compared to the conventional constant for collisions between identical particles.Google Scholar
16 Stutzmann, M., Jackson, W. B., and Tsai, C. C., Phys. Rev. B 32, 23 (1985).Google Scholar
17 Zafar, S. and Schiff, E. A., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 137, 323 (1991).Google Scholar
18 Branz, H. M., unpublished.Google Scholar
19 Tzanetakis, P., private communication.Google Scholar
20 Stutzmann, M., Nunnenkamp, J., Brandt, M. S., Asano, A., and Rossi, M. C., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 137–138, 231 (1991).Google Scholar
21 Tzanetakis, P., Kopidakis, N., and Fritzsche, H., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 198–200, 276 (1996).Google Scholar
22 Masson, D. P., Ouhlal, A., and Yelon, A., J Non-Cryst. Solids 190, 151 (1995).Google Scholar
23 Fritzsche, H., Solid State Commun. 94, 953 (1995).Google Scholar