Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T02:18:18.339Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Highly Oriented Diamond Films Grown at High Growth Rate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Xianglin Li
Affiliation:
xli9@ncsu.edu, North Carolina State University, Materials Science and Engineering, 1001 Capability Dr., RM 221, Raleigh, NC, 27606, United States, 919-515-6177, 919-515-3419
Ramon Collazo
Affiliation:
rcollaz@unity.ncsu.edu, North Carolina State University, Materials Science and Engineering, Raleigh, NC, 27606, United States
Zlatko Sitar
Affiliation:
sitar@ncsu.edu, North Carolina State University, Materials Science and Engineering, Raleigh, NC, 27606, United States
Get access

Abstract

Highly oriented diamond (HOD) films were grown at a high growth rate on (100) silicon substrates by microwave plasma chemical vapor deposition (MPCVD), following the standard bias-enhanced nucleation (BEN) process. The growth rate and diamond quality were investigated as a function of methane concentration in hydrogen (2-6%), and N2/CH4 ratio (0 to 0.12). A four-fold increase in the growth rate of HOD films and a three times faster expansion and coalescence of (100) facets was observed within the above process window. The films with the best quality were grown under an N2/CH4 ratio of 0.08 at methane concentration of 3.5%. The ratio of x-ray intensity between the first order twins and {111} poles was only 1%. A detailed study of the crystalline quality and phase purity as a function of methane concentration and nitrogen addition is presented.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Wolter, S.D., Okuzumi, F., Prater, J.T., and Sitar, Z., J. Electrochem. Soc., 149, G114117 (2002).Google Scholar
2. Wolter, S.D., Okuzumi, F., Prater, J.T., and Sitar, Z., Phys. Stat. Sol. A 186, 331337 (2001).Google Scholar
3. Evans, E. A., and Augus, J. C., Diamond Relat. Mater. 5, 200 (1996).Google Scholar
4. Harris, S. J. and Weiner, A. M., J. Appl. Phys. 75, 5026 (1994).Google Scholar
5. Yan, C.S., Vohra, Y. K., Mao, H.K., and Hemley, R. J., Proc. of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 20, 12523 (2002).Google Scholar
6. Williams, Oliver A., and Jackman, Richard B., Diamond Relat. Mater. 13, 557 (2004).Google Scholar
7. Li, X., Perkins, J., Collazo, R., Nemanich, R.J. and Sitar, Z., Diamond Relat. Mater. In Press, (2006).Google Scholar
8. Wolter, S.D., Borca-Tasciuc, D.A., Chen, G., Govindaraju, N., Collazo, R., Okuzumi, F., Prater, J.T., Sitar, Z., Diamond and Relat. Mater. 12, 6164 (2003).Google Scholar
9. Govindaraju, N., Thermal conductivity analysis of diamond films, Ph.D. Thesis, North Carolina State University, Dept. of Material Science and Engineering, 2004, available through www.lib.ncsu.edu.Google Scholar
10. Bohr, S., Haubner, R., Lux, B., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68 (8), 1075 (1996).Google Scholar
11. Jin, S., Moustakas, T.D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 65 (4), 403 (1994).10.1063/1.112315Google Scholar
12. Haubner, R., Diamond Relat. Mater. 14, 355 (2005).Google Scholar