Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-tsvsl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T10:15:41.356Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High Performance Polycrystalline Silicon Thin Film Devices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

William G. Hawkins*
Affiliation:
Xerox Corporation, Webster Research Center, Webster, New York 14580
Get access

Abstract

The goal of this work was to produce a fabrication process for high performance polycrystalline silicon thin film MOS devices. We have fabricated p-channel devices with mobilities of 35 cm2/V-sec and n-channel devices with mobilities of 50 cm2/V-sec by tailoring the process for depositon of the channel layer, by gate oxidation of the channel at high temperature, and by use of plasma hydrogenation. Under optimal conditions deduced from the study, device threshold voltages are close to zero. Leakage currents in the off-state are less than 0.1 pA/µm of channel length. Fabrication of the devices requires four mask levels and employs standard process steps. Therefore, polycrystalline silicon devices are attractive candidates for a variety of electronics applications, including thin film logic over large area.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Malhi, S. D. S., Chatterjee, P. K., Pinizzotto, R. F., Lam, H. W., Chen, C. E. C., Shichijo, H., Shah, R. R. and Bellavance, D. W., IEEE Electron Device Letters EDL–4, 369 (1983).Google Scholar
2. Kamins, T. I., Solid State Electronics 15, 789 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Onga, S., Mizutani, Y., Taniguchi, K., Kashiwagi, M., Shibata, K. and Kohyama, S., Japanese J. Appl. Phys. 21,1472 (1982).Google Scholar
4. Seto, J. Y. W., J. Appl. Phys. 46 (1975).Google Scholar
5. Kamins, T. I., IEEE Electron Device Letters EDL–1, 159 (1980).Google Scholar
6. Harbeke, G., Krausbauer, L., Steigmeier, E. F., Widmer, A. E., Kappert, H. F. and Neugebauer, G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 42, 249 (1983).Google Scholar
7. Antoniadis, D. A., J. Electrochem. Soc. 129, 1093 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Harris, R. M. and Antoniadis, D. A., Appl. Phys Lett. 43, 937 (1983).Google Scholar
9. Wada, Y. and Nishimatsu, S., J. Electrochem. Soc. 125, 1499 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar