Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T12:02:24.329Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Growth Rate Enhancement in Selective Area Movpe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Takuya Fujii
Affiliation:
Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd., 10-1 Morinosato-Wakamiya, Atsugi 243-01, Japan
Mitsuru Ekawa
Affiliation:
Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd., 10-1 Morinosato-Wakamiya, Atsugi 243-01, Japan
Toshiyuki Tanahashi
Affiliation:
Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd., 10-1 Morinosato-Wakamiya, Atsugi 243-01, Japan
Get access

Abstract

We investigated the growth rate enhancement in selective area metalorganic vapor phase epitaxy with a new surface boundary condition for the vapor phase concentration of source materials. In our model, the growth rate is proportional to the vapor phase concentration at a distance of the vapor phase mean-free path of source materials from the substrates, and the vapor phase concentration is laterally uniform at the top of the stagnant layer. This model predicts that the growth rate modulation produced by mask-patterning disappears at a specific pressure at which the vapor phase mean-free path reaches the stagnant layer thickness. We controlled the vapor phase mean-free path of trimethylindium in InP growth by varying the growth pressure from 6 to 180 Torr with a fixed total inlet gas flow rate to the reactor. Experiments showed a great reduction of the growth rate enhancement with the decrease in the growth pressure and the growth rate enhancement virtually disappeared at the lowest pressure. We also investigated the dependence of the stagnant layer thickness on the mask design. The experimental stagnant layer thickness related to the typical surface length, such as the period of mask-patterning.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Galeuchet, Y. D., Roentgen, P., and Graf, V., J. Appl. Phys. 68, 560 (1990).Google Scholar
2. Aoki, M., Sato, H., Suzuki, M., Takahashi, M., Uomi, K., and Takai, A., Electron. Lett. 27, 2138 (1991).Google Scholar
3. Colas, E., Caneau, C., Frei, M., Clausen, E. M. Jr., Quinn, W. E., and Kim, M. S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 2019 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Sasaki, T., Kitamura, M., Mito, I., J. Crystal Growth 132,435 (1993).Google Scholar
5. Gibbon, M., Stagg, J. P., Cureton, C. G., Thrush, E. J., Jones, C. J., Mallard, R. E., Pritchard, R. E., Collis, N., and Chew, A., Semicond. Sci. Technol. 8, 998 (1993).Google Scholar
6. Fujii, T., Ekawa, M., and Yamazaki, S., J. Crystal Growth 146,475 (1995).Google Scholar
7. Fujii, T., Ekawa, M., and Yamazaki, S., J. Crystal Growth 156, 59 (1995).Google Scholar
8. Fujii, T., and Ekawa, M., J. Appl. Phys. 78, 5373 (1995).Google Scholar