Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:25:42.633Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Growth and Structure of Metallic Barrie Laye and Interconnect Films I: Exeriments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

D. L. Windt
Affiliation:
Bell Labs, Lucent Technologies, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
J. Dalla Torre
Affiliation:
Bell Labs, Lucent Technologies, Murray Hill, NJ 07974 LPST-ESA54777-CNRS, Universite Paul Sabiatier, and LAAS-CNRS, Toulouse, France
G. H. Gilmer
Affiliation:
Bell Labs, Lucent Technologies, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
J. Sapjeta
Affiliation:
Bell Labs, Lucent Technologies, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
R. Kalyanaraman
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Labs, Oak Ridge, IN 37831
F. H. Baumann
Affiliation:
Bell Labs, Lucent Technologies, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
P. L. O'Sullivan
Affiliation:
Bell Labs, Lucent Technologies, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
D. Dunn
Affiliation:
University of Virginia, Dept. of Mat. Sci. & Eng., Charlottesville, VA 22903
R. Hull
Affiliation:
University of Virginia, Dept. of Mat. Sci. & Eng., Charlottesville, VA 22903
Get access

Abstract

We present experimental results directed at understanding the growth and structure of metallic barrier layer and interconnect films. Numerical simulation results associated with this experimental work are presented in an accompanying paper in these proceedings. Here, thin films of Al, Ti, Cu and Ta have been grown by magnetron sputtering onto oxidized Si substrates. Using a specially-constructed substrate holder, the orientation of the substrate with respect to the growth direction was varied from horizontal to vertical. Films were grown at both low and high argon pressure; in the case of Ta, the cathode power was varied as well. The film structure and in particular the surface roughness was measured by X-ray reflectance and also by atomic force microscopy. We find that the surface roughness increases markedly with orientation angle in the case of Ta and Cu films, and in Ti films grown at high argon pressure. At low pressure, however, the Ti film surface roughness remains constant for all substrate orientations. No variation in roughness with either orientation angle or argon pressure was observed in the Al films. These results suggest that, under certain circumstances, shadowing effects and/or grain orientation (i.e., texture) competition during growth can give rise to lower density, more porous (and thus more rough) films, particularly at large orientation angles, as on sidewalls in sub-micron trenches.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. ‘Thin Film Processes’, edited by Vossen, J. L. and Kern, W., Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1978, pp. 115129 Google Scholar
2. Windt, D. L., Computers in Physics, 12, 360370 (1998)Google Scholar
3. Steams, D. G., J. Appl. Phys. 65, 491506 (1989)Google Scholar
4. Note, however, that for thicker films, the amplitude of the oscillations are also reduced as a result of the finite instrumental angular resolution.Google Scholar
5. The rms surface roughness values determined by AFM are consistently less than those determined from XRR analysis. This discrepancy is due to the difference in spatial frequencies sampled by each technique. See, for example, Windt, D. L., Waskiewicz, W. K., and Griffith, J. E., App. Opt., 33, 20252031 (1994)Google Scholar
6. ‘Thin Film Processes’, edited by Vossen, J. L. and Kern, W., Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1978, pp. 101102.Google Scholar
7. Thornton, J. A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol, 11, 666670 (1974)Google Scholar
8. Roy, R. A. and Messier, R., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 2, 312315 (1984)10.1116/1.572590Google Scholar
9. Windishcmann, H., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 9, 24312436 (1991)Google Scholar
10. D'Heurle, F. M., Metall. Transactions, 1, 725732 (1970)Google Scholar
11. Bales, G. S. and Zangwill, A., J. Vac. Sci. TechnoL A., 9 145149 (1991)Google Scholar