Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T01:36:57.058Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Grain Boundary Sliding Kinetics and Stress Relaxation Phenomena in Ni Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

F. Cosandey
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, Dept. of Mechanics and Materials Science, Piscataway, NJ 08854
S. Ui
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, Dept. of Mechanics and Materials Science, Piscataway, NJ 08854
B. Cao
Affiliation:
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Institute de Genie Atomique, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
R. Schaller
Affiliation:
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Institute de Genie Atomique, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
W. Benoit
Affiliation:
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Institute de Genie Atomique, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
Get access

Abstract

Internal friction measurements have been performed on Ni-20 wt% Cr alloys containing trace additions of Ce ranging from 0 to 180 at ppm, in order to determine grain boundary sliding kinetics and associated stress relaxation phenomena. Two anelastic relaxation peaks have been observed corresponding to intrinsic grain boundary sliding between carbide precipitates and to macroscopic sliding with elastic accommodation at triple points. The effects of Ce on these grain boundary phenomena and resulting alloy ductilities are also presented.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Evans, H.E. “Mechanicms of Creep Fracture,” Elsevier Publ. 1984.Google Scholar
2. “Symposium on the Role of Trace Elements and Interfaces in Creep Failure ” Met Trans. 14A 520 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. McLean, M. and Strang, A., Metals Tech. 11. 454 (1984).Google Scholar
4. Cosandey, F. and Li, S. (to be published).Google Scholar
5. Gleiter, H. and Chalmers, B., Progr. Mater. Sci. 16, (1972).Google Scholar
6. Bauer, J. and Kulik, A., J. Physique 44, C9, 357 (1983).Google Scholar
7. Moulin, P., Huntz, A.M. and Lacombe, P., Acta Met 27, 1437 (1979).Google Scholar
8. Delaunay, D., Huntz, A.M. and Lacombe, P, Scripta Met. 13, 419 (1979).Google Scholar
9. Monman, K., Suto, H. and Oikawa, H., J. Japan Inst. Metals 28 253 (1964).Google Scholar
10. Venkataraman, G. and Cosandey, F., Mat. Sci. and Eng. 93 175 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar