Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T02:23:47.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gold clusters: the role of the ion energy in their formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Elsa Thune
Affiliation:
Zweites Physikalisches Institut, Universität Göttingen, Bunsenstrasse 7-9, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany
Ettore Carpene
Affiliation:
Zweites Physikalisches Institut, Universität Göttingen, Bunsenstrasse 7-9, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany
Katharina Sauthoff
Affiliation:
Viertes Physikalisches Institut, Universität Göttingen, Bunsenstrasse 13-15, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany
Michael Seibt
Affiliation:
Viertes Physikalisches Institut, Universität Göttingen, Bunsenstrasse 13-15, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany
Petra Reinke
Affiliation:
Zweites Physikalisches Institut, Universität Göttingen, Bunsenstrasse 7-9, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany
Get access

Abstract

The rapidly growing interest in the deposition of size-selected nanoclusters on surfaces is motivated both by technology and by basic physical questions. Due to their finite size, small particles have totally different material properties compared to their bulk crystalline counterparts. Clusters have been deposited by a monoenergetic, mass-selected ion beam with low energies (10-500 eV) on amorphous carbon substrates, which are used to minimize the influence of surface crystallography and ion-induced structural changes. Gold clusters were deposited as a model system to study the ion energy dependence, the temporal evolution, and the influence of the temperature on the cluster distribution. For impact energies below 100 eV, surface processes dominate the cluster nucleation and growth. If higher energies are used, an increasing number of ions is implanted below the surface and different processes control the cluster formation. When the energy increases above 350 eV, the cluster size drastically drops below 5 nm. The clusters are analysed with different methods such as Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM), Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), and X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) to determine their size distribution, composition and structure.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Jensen, P., Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 1695 (1999)Google Scholar
2. Yoon, B., Akulin, V.M. et al., Surf. Sci. 443, 76 (1999)Google Scholar
3. Sanchez, A. et al., J. Phys. Chem. A 103, 9573 (1999)Google Scholar
4. Fecht, H. J., Europhys. News 28, 89 (1997)Google Scholar
5. Hofsäss, H., Binder, H., Klumpp, T. and Recknagel, E., Diam. Relat. Mater. 3, 137 (1994)Google Scholar
6. Hofsäss, H. and Ronning, C., in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Beam Processing of Advanced Materials, edited by Singh, J., Copley, S.M. and Mazumder, J (ASM International, Materials Park, 1996)Google Scholar
7. Uhrmacher, M., Pampus, K., Bergmeister, F.J., Purschke, D. and Lieb, K., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 9, 234 (1985)Google Scholar
8. Doolittle, L.R., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 9, 344 (1985)Google Scholar
9. Doniach, S. and Sunjic, M., J. Phys. C 3, 285 (1970)Google Scholar
10. DiCenzo, S.B., Berry, S.D., and Hartford, E.H., Phys. Rev. B 38, 8465 (1988)Google Scholar
11. Wertheim, G. K. and DiCenzo, S.B., Phys. Rev. B 37, 844 (1988)Google Scholar
12. Boyen, H.G., Herzog, Th., Kaestle, G., Weigl, F., Ziemann, P., Spatz, J.P., and Moeller, M., Phys. Rev. B 65, 075412 (2002)Google Scholar