Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:34:27.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Geochemical Simulation of Dissolution of West Valley and Dnpf Glasses in J-13 Water at 90°C

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Carol J. Bruton
Carol J. Bruton*
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, P.O. Box 808, Livermore, CA 94550
Get access

Abstract

Dissolution of West Valley and Defense Waste Product Facility (DWPF) glasses in J-13 water at 90°C at the candidate Yucca Mountain, Nevada repository was simulated using the EQ316 computer code package. The objectives of the study were to attempt to predict the concentrations of radionuclides and other glass components in solution resulting from glass dissolution, and to identify potential precipitates that sequester glass components.

Modified projected inventories of 10,000 year-old Nest Valley and DNPF SRL-165 frit glasses were used as starting glass compositions. J-13 water was considered to be representative of groundwater at Yucca Mountain. A total of 10 grams of each glass was assumed to dissolve congruently into a kilogram of J-13 water in a closed system. No inhibitions to precipitation, except for crystalline SiO2 polymorphs, were assumed to exist. Radiolysis and materials interactions were not considered.

Simulation results predict that radionuclides and other glass components precipitate predominantly in the form of oxides and hydroxides, together with carbonates, silicates and phosphates. Precipitates appear to be effective in limiting the concentrations of radionuclides and other elements in solution. The general compositional trends in precipitates and solution chemistry are the same in the West Valley and DMPF simulations, except for variations arising from differences in glass chemistry.

Concentrations of elements released from glass increase until the solution reaches saturation with respect to solids that contain these elements. Elemental concentrations are then predicted to remain constant, increase or decrease depending on: 1) whether the reaction between the dominant aqueous species of the element in solution and its precipitate is pH and/or Eh-dependent; 2) whether the species distribution of the element in solution changes significantly in response to changes in pH, Eh, or other factors; and 3) the competition with other phases for elements required to form the precipitate. pH increases from 7.3 to 9.8 and from 7.2 to 10 in the West Valley and DWPF simulations, respectively. Eh decreases abruptly from about 0.5 to 0.3 volts after dissolution of 3.4 and 5.8 grams of glass in the Nest Valley and DMPF simulations, respectively, because of depletion of dissolved oxygen in solution. Complexing of aqueous species has a significant impact on radionuclide concentrations in solution; predicted concentrations of U in solution, for example, are controlled by the presence or absence of P in solution because H2PO4 is an extremely effective complexing agent for U.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 112: Symposium P – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XI , 1987 , 607
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Molery, T.J., Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, UCRL-52658, 1979.Google Scholar
2. Eisenstatt, L.R., West Valley Demonstration Proj. WVDP-056, rev. 0, 1986.Google Scholar
3. Baxter, R.G., Savannah River Plant Report DP-1606, rev. 1, 1983.Google Scholar
4. Delany, J.M., Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, UCRL-53631, 1985.Google Scholar
5. Grambow, B., Ph.D. thesis, Freie Universitaet Berlin, 1984.Google Scholar
6. Arnorsson, S., Am. Jour. Sci. 275, 763 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Brindley, G.W. and Brown, G., eds., Crystal Structures of Clay Minerals and their X-ray Identification (Min. Soc. Mon. No. 5, London, England, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Harker, A.B. and Flintoff, J.F., Nuclear Tech. 76, 263 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Bates, J.K., Seitz, M.G. and Steindler, M.J., Nuclear and Chemical Waste Management, 5, 63 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Bates, J.K., Gerding, T.J., Abrajano, T.A., Ebert, N.L. and Mazer, J.J., Argonne Natl. Lab., Draft of semi-annual report, July–Dec. 1986, 1987.Google Scholar
11. Aines, R.D., Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, UCRL-93735, 1986.Google Scholar
12. Strachan, D.M., Krupka, K.M. and Grambow, B., Nuclear and Chemical Waste Management, 5, 87 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Pine, G.L. and Jantzen, C.M., E.I. duPont de Nemours and Co., Savannah River Laboratory, DR-1742, 1987.Google Scholar
14. Mendel, J.E., compiler, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, PNL-5157, 1984.Google Scholar
15. Flintoff, J.F. and Harker, A.B., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VIII, edited by C.M., Jantzen, J.A., Stone and R.C., Ewing (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 44, Pittsburgh, PA, 1985) pp. 147–154.Google Scholar
16. Bates, J.K., Gerding, T.L., Abrajano, T.A., Ebert, M.L. and Mazer, J.J., Argonne Nati. Lab., Draft of quarterly progress report, Jan–Mar 1987, 1987.Google Scholar
17. Haaker, R., Malow, G. and Offermann, P., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Maste Management VIII, edited by C.M., Jantzen, J.A., Stone and R.C., Ewing (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 44, Pittsburgh, PA, 1985) pp. 121–128.Google Scholar
18. Van Iseghem, P., Timmermans, N. and DeBatist, R., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VIII, edited by C.M., Jantzen, J.A., Stone and R.C., Ewing (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 44, Pittsburgh, PA, 1985) pp. 55–62.Google Scholar
19. Sheetz, B.E., Freeborn, M.P., Smith, D.K., Anderson, C., Zolensky, M. and White, M.D., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Maste Management VIII, edited by C.M., Jantzen, J.A., Stone and R.C., Ewing (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 44, Pittsburgh, PA, 1985) pp. 129–134.Google Scholar
20. Stahl, D. and Miller, N.E., U.S. Nuclear Reg. Comm. NUREG/CR4379, 3, 1986.Google Scholar