Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T00:20:57.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

First-Principles Calculation of the Structure of Mercury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Michael J. Mehl
Michael J. Mehl*
Affiliation:
Complex Systems Theory Branch, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375-5345
Get access

Abstract

Mercury has perhaps the strangest behavior of any of the metals. Although the other metals in column IIB have an hcp ground state, mercury's ground state is the body centered tetragonal βHg phase. The most common phase of mercury is the rhombohedral αHg phase, which is stable from 79K to the melting point and meta-stable below 79K. Another rhombohedral phase, γ71Hg, is believed to exist at low temperatures. First-principles calculations are used to study the energetics of the various phases of mercury. Even when partial spin-orbit effects are included, the calculations indicate that the hexagonal close packed structure is the ground state. It is suggested that a better treatment of the spinorbit interaction might alter this result.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 408: Symposium P – Materials Theory, Simulations, and Parallel Algorithms , 1995 , 383
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Wycoff, R. W. G., Crystal Structures Vol.1, 2nd edition, (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1963), pp. 17–18.Google Scholar
[2] Donohue, J., The Structures of the Elements, (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1974), pp. 191–199.Google Scholar
[3] Boyer, L. L., Acta Crystallogr. A45, FC29 (1989).Google Scholar
[4] Bain, E. C., Trans. AIME, 70, 25 (1924).Google Scholar
[5] Ballone, P. and Galli, G., Phys. Rev. B 40, 8563 (1989).Google Scholar
[6] Neisler, P. and Pitzer, K. S., J. Phys. Chem. 91, 1084 (1987).Google Scholar
[7] Singh, P. P., Phys. Rev. B 49, 4954 (1994).Google Scholar
[8] Andersen, O.K., Phys. Rev.B 12 3060 (1975)Google Scholar
[9] Wei, S.H. and Krakauer, H., Phys. Rev. Lett. 55 1200 (1985).Google Scholar
[10] Singh, D. J., Planewaves, Pseudopotentials, and the LAPW Method, (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1994).Google Scholar
[11] Hedin, L. and Lundqvist, B. I., J. Phys. C 4, 2064 (1971).Google Scholar
[12] Kohn, W. and Sham, L.J., Phys. Rev. 140 A1133 (1965).Google Scholar
[13] Hohenberg, P. and Kohn, W., Phys. Rev. 136, B864 (1964).Google Scholar
[14] Koelling, D. D. and Harmon, B. N., J. Phys. C 10, 2041 (1975).Google Scholar
[15] MacDonald, A. H., Pickett, W. E., and Koelling, D. D., J. Phys. C 13, 2675 (1980).Google Scholar
[16] Liberman, D. A., Cromer, D. T., and Waber, J. J., Comput. Phys. Commun. 2, 107 (1971).Google Scholar
[17] Perdew, J. P., Chevary, J. A., Vosko, S. H., Jackson, K. A., Pederson, M. R., Singh, D. J., and Fiolhais, C., Phys. Rev. B 46, 6671 (1992) and references therein.Google Scholar