Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T10:18:10.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Failure Mechanisms of Particulate Two-Phase Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

T. Antretter
Affiliation:
Institute of Mechanics, Montanuniversität Leoben, Franz-Josef-Straβe 18, A-8700 Leoben, Austria, e-mail: antrette@grz08u.unileoben.ac.at
E D. Fischer
Affiliation:
Institute of Mechanics, Montanuniversität Leoben, Franz-Josef-Straβe 18, A-8700 Leoben, Austria
Get access

Abstract

In many composites consisting of hard and brittle inclusions embedded in a ductile matrix failure can be attributed to particle cleavage followed by ductile crack growth in the matrix. Both mechanisms are significantly sensitive towards the presence of residual stresses.

On the one hand particle failure depends on the stress distribution inside the inclusion, which, in turn, is a function of various geometrical parameters such as the aspect ratio and the position relative to adjacent particles as well as the external load. On the other hand it has been observed that the absolute size of each particle plays a role as well and will, therefore, be taken into account in this work by means of the Weibull theory. Unit cells containing a number of quasi-randomly oriented elliptical inclusions serve as the basis for the finite element calculations. The numerical results are then correlated to the geometrical parameters defining the inclusions. The probability of fracture has been evaluated for a large number of inclusions and plotted versus the particle size. The parameters of the fitting curves to the resulting data points depend on the choice of the Weibull parameters.

A crack tip opening angle criterion (CTOA) is used to describe crack growth in the matrix emanating from a broken particle. It turns out that the crack resistance of the matrix largely depends on the distance from an adjacent particle. Residual stresses due to quenching of the material tend to reduce the risk of particle cleavage but promote crack propagation in the matrix.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Danzer, R.: A General Strength Distribution Function for Brittle Materials. J. Europ. Ceram. Soc. 10, (1992) 461472.Google Scholar
[2] Antretter, T.: Micromechanical Modeling of High Speed Steel. Doctoral Thesis, Montanuniversitait Leoben, Austria, 1998, p. 48.Google Scholar
[3] Antretter, T. and Fischer, F D.: Stress State and Failure of Carbides in Tool Steel – A Micromechanical Study. Progress in Tool Steels (Eds Berns, H., Hinz, H.F., Hucklenbroich, I.M.), 501509; Schiirmann und Klagges, Bochum, Germany (1996).Google Scholar
[4] Shan, G. X., Kolednik, O., Fischer, F. D.: A Numerical Investigation on the Geometry Dependence of the Crack Growth Resistance in CT Specimens. Int. J. Fract. 66, (1994) 173187.Google Scholar
[5] Shan, G. X., Kolednik, O., Fischer, F. D.: A Numerical Study on the Crack Growth Behavior of a Low and a High Strength Steel. Eng. Fract. Mech. 78, (1996) 335346.Google Scholar