Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T07:45:11.952Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experimental Study of Nickel Solubility in Sulfidic Groundwater under Anoxic Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

T. Carlsson
Affiliation:
VTT Chemical Technology, P.O. Box 1404, FIN-02044 VTT, Finland Email: torbjorn.carlsson@vtt.fi
U. Vuorinen
Affiliation:
VTT Chemical Technology, P.O. Box 1404, FIN-02044 VTT, Finland Email: torbjorn.carlsson@vtt.fi
T. Kekki
Affiliation:
VTT Chemical Technology, P.O. Box 1404, FIN-02044 VTT, Finland Email: torbjorn.carlsson@vtt.fi
H. Aalto
Affiliation:
VTT Chemical Technology, P.O. Box 1404, FIN-02044 VTT, Finland Email: torbjorn.carlsson@vtt.fi
Get access

Abstract

This paper presents the results from an experimental study of the nickel solubility in sulfidic groundwater under anoxic conditions. The waters used were natural groundwater from Olkiluoto and synthetic saline groundwater, to which sulfide had been added. Two sulfide concentrations, 3.1.10−6 M and 9.4.10−5 M, were used. The possible influence of ferrous iron on the nickel concentration was also studied by adding small amounts of iron chloride, which yielded ferrous iron concentrations of 1.8.10−5 M or less.

The initial nickel concentrations in the water samples were 1.0.10−6 M and 1.0.10−3 M. The nickel concentrations were determined using 63Ni and liquid scintillation counting. The duration of the experiments was 177 days.

The results for the waters differed markedly. The nickel concentration in the natural groundwater decreased in all samples to roughly 10% of the initial value.

The nickel concentration in the synthetic groundwater was found to decrease in those samples having initial sulfide and nickel concentrations of 9.4.10−5 M and 1.0.10−6 M, respectively. The nickel concentration was in this case reduced to about 1% of its initial value. For the other synthetic groundwater samples, the nickel concentration remained at its original initial level.

The variation of the ferrous iron concentration did not have any observable effect on the measured nickel concentrations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Vieno, T., Mészáros, F., Nordman, H., and Taivassalo, V., Nuclear Waste Commission of Finnish Power Companies, Report YJT-93-27, (1993).Google Scholar
2. Thoenen, T., Nuclear Technology, Vol. 126, (1999), p. 7587.Google Scholar
3. Vuorinen, U. and Snellman, M., Posiva Oy, Helsinki, Working Report 98–61, (1998).Google Scholar
4. Carlsson, T. and Aalto, H., VTT Research Notes 1793, (1996).Google Scholar
5. Carlsson, T., Aalto, H., and Vuorinen, U., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 556, Pittsburgh, PA, 969 (1999).Google Scholar
6. Wolery, T. J., Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Report UCRL-MA-110662 PT III.Google Scholar