Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T03:19:29.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Examination of the Defect Pool Model by An Improved Analysis of the Constant Photocurrent Method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Helmut Stiebig  and
Frank Siebke
Helmut Stiebig
Affiliation:
Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institute of Thin Film and Ion Technology (ISI-PV), P.O. Box 1913, D-52425 Jülich, Germany
Frank Siebke
Affiliation:
Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institute of Thin Film and Ion Technology (ISI-PV), P.O. Box 1913, D-52425 Jülich, Germany
Get access

Abstract

We have developed an improved analysis of constant photocurrent method (CPM) data. It is based on a numerical simulation of CPM spectra taking into account the full set of optical transitions between localized and extended states, capture and emission processes as well as the position of the Fermi level. Comparing measured and simulated CPM spectra provides information about the density of localized states in a-Si:H, i.e. the valence band tail, the integrated defect density, the energy distribution and the charge state of defect states. Based on these results we examine the predictions of the defect-pool model. The defect distribution in undoped and doped a-Si:H can be described by the defect-pool model taking into account the doping level dependence of principal parameters including the valence band tail, the equilibration temperature, and the width of the defect-pool.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 377: Symposium A – Amorphous Silicon Technology 1995 , 1995 , 287
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Powell, M.J. and Deane, S.C., Phys. Rev. B 48, 10815 (1993).Google Scholar
2. Smith, Z.E. and Wagner, S., in Amorphous Silicon and Related Materials, edited by Fritzsche, H. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989) 409.Google Scholar
3. Schumm, G. and Bauer, G.H., Phil. Mag. B 64, 515 (1991)Google Scholar
4. Vanecek, M., Kocka, J., Stuchlik, J., Kozizek, Z., Stika, O. and Triska, A., Solar Energy Mater. 8, 411 (1983).Google Scholar
5. Pierz, K., Hilgenberg, B., Mell, H. and Weiser, G., J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 97&98, 63 (1987).Google Scholar
6. Hattori, K., Fukuda, S., Nishimura, N., Okamoto, H. and Hamakawa, Y., J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 164–166, 351 (1993).Google Scholar
7. Siebke, F. and Stiebig, H., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 336, 371 (1994).Google Scholar
8. Stutzmann, M., Phil. Mag. B 60, 531 (1989).Google Scholar
9. Krötz, G., Wind, J., Müller, G., Kalbitzer, S., and Mannsperger, H., Phil. Mag. B 63, 101 (1991).Google Scholar
10. Street, R.A., Kakalios, J., Tsai, C.C., and Hayes, T.N., Phys. Rev. B 35, 1316 (1987)Google Scholar
11. Weiser, G. and Mell, H., J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 114, 298 (1989).Google Scholar
12. Nakata, M., Wagner, S., and Peterson, T.M., J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 164–166, 179 (1993).Google Scholar
13. Siebke, F., Stiebig, H., Abo-Arais, A., and Wagner, H., First World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion (WCPEC), Waikoloa, Hawaii, 5.-9. December 1994.Google Scholar