Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T21:17:39.181Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evolution of Epitaxial SixGei1-x Alloys on Si(100) During Thermal Annealing a-Ge/Au Bilayers Deposited on Si Substrate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Z. Ma
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Coordinated Science Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801.
L. H. Allen
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Coordinated Science Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801.
Get access

Abstract

Solid phase epitaxial (SPE) growth of SixGei1-x alloys on Si (100) was achieved by thermal annealing a-Ge/Au bilayers deposited on single crystal Si substrate in the temperature range of 280°C to 310°C. Growth dynamics was investigated using X-ray diffraction, Rutherford backscattering spectrometry, and cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy. Upon annealing, Ge atoms migrate along the grain boundaries of polycrystalline Au and the epitaxial growth initiates at localized triple points between two Au grains and Si substrate, simultaneously incorporating a small amount of Si dissolved in Au. The Au is gradually displaced into the top Ge layer. Individual single crystal SixGei1-x islands then grow laterally as well as vertically. Finally, the islands coalesce to form a uniform layer of epitaxial SixGe1-x alloy on the Si substrate. The amount of Si incorporated in the final epitaxial film was found to be dependent upon the annealing temperature.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Pearsall, T.P., Mater. Sci. Eng. B9, 225 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. CGronet, M., King, C.A., Opyd, W., Gibbons, J.F., Wilson, S.D., and Hull, R., J. Appl. Phys. 61, 2407 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Lombardo, S., Smith, P.M., Uttormark, M.J., Brunco, D.P., Kramer, K., and Thompson, M.O., Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 1768 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Hong, Q.Z., Zhu, J.G., and Mayer, J.W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 55, 747 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Ma, Z., Xu, Y., and Allen, L.H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 61, 225 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Ottaviani, G., Sigurd, D., Marrello, V., Mayer, J.W., and McCaldin, J.O., J. Appl. Phys. 45, 1730 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Booker, G.R. and Stickler, R., J. Appl. Phys. 33, 328 (1962).Google Scholar
8. Hong, Q.Z., Zhu, J.G., Xia, W., and Mayer, J. W., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 160, 313 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar